Anyone else have experience with JBOD and Storage Spaces that could provide 
some input?

Thanks,

Eric

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Kurt Buff<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:08 PM
To: ntsysadm<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Storage Spaces Options for Backup Target

Backblaze pod running Linux with Samba, or perhaps running Server 2012R2?

https://www.backblaze.com/b2/storage-pod.html
and
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/open-source-data-storage-server/

It does use a SuperMicro motherboard...

Kurt

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Eric Morrison
<[email protected]> wrote:
> For our backup environment, we use DPM on Hyper-V on a SOFS for dedup. Time
> to replace the SOFS nodes and backend FC SAN as it’s really old.
>
>
>
> We’re looking at a few options and I was curious if anyone had any
> experience with anything like this?
>
>
>
> 1.       DataOn CiB which has two nodes running Windows Server 2012 R2 and
> storage spaces as the SMB target for the DPM VMs.
>
> a.       I personally like this option as it’s only 4U and we would only
> half populate it with 34 drives to accomplish our usable space requirements.
> We could also expand up to 70 drives in the future to fully populate if we
> need more space and can even add one of their JBOD systems for additional
> space.
>
> 2.       SuperMicro CiB is also a two node system like DataOn.
>
> a.       I don’t care for this one as much, since it only has 24 drive
> capacity in 4U, compared to DataOn 70 drive capacity, and would require an
> additional 4U JBOD to reach the same amount of usable space as the DataOn.
>
> 3.       JBOD from any vendor, like SuperMicro and two rackmount boxes
> connected via SAS to the JBOD box.
>
> a.       DataOn has an option like this where we’d have to supply our own
> server nodes, which is no problem. SuperMicro also has a 90 bay drive bay
> JBOD that we could use.
>
>
>
> So far between option 1 and 2 is only around a $2k to $5k with SuperMicro
> solution being built on ThinkMate.com and DataOn quote after speaking with
> their sales people.
>
>
>
> So besides DataOn and SuperMicro, are there any other inexpensive options to
> achieve around 160TB usable space as an SMB target?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Eric Morrison
>
>



Reply via email to