Thx for the feedback ,  im a bit confused though, in one response you said 
its.typical (edge for external comms and one.for.internal) , on the other 
hand.you said it could have been  a stalled or broken  config.

And there is no one to ask because  they just hired  a new "director of IT" 
who quite frankly  knows less than my 9 yr old nephew. 

This person does not even know how spin up a VM-

I will ask why there are two and see what the respnse is


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Lync / Skype
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:06:05 +0000









There are number of configurations where this could be possible (Lync on the 
Edge, SfB on the backend, for example), but none of them are ideal and would 
generally
 indicate that a migration got stalled or broken in the middle. 
 
I would ask that question. Doing a DR on a broken config is generally not a 
simple thing to do.
 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of J- P

Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 8:45 AM

To: Exchange List; NT

Subject: [NTSysADM] Lync / Skype


 


Hi all,


 


First off excuse the cross-post , but I wasn't sure if it should be the 
Exchange or NT list;


 


To start forgive my ignorance here, but the last time I setup an MS  
communication server it was just that , 2005 Live communication server, which 
brings me to my question;




I'm doing a DR plan for a client, and their admin tells me they have a Lync 
Server and a Skype for business server,  I thought (and again forgive my lack 
of exp) that Skype for business was the replacement for Lync, if that is indeed 
the case why would they
 be running both?


 


the only thing I can tell you is that they have about 50 phones

  


 


TIA

 






                                          

Reply via email to