Good grief - normally a PoE switch costs more, not less. I hope your VAR provides you with a whole lot of service and training to go with that unit.
But I don't believe you'll lose any other funtionality besides the PoE. Kurt On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > So I can get a juniper ex4300-48p on newegg for 800 dollars less than > the ex4300-48t from my vendor, both are new , both have the same specs , > except the POE obviously > > > while I actually wont use the POE (because the heat it generates is way > too much for the enclosed server cabinet), could there be any downside to > getting this one? > > > > > > I just cant justify the extra $$$ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > on behalf of Kurt Buff <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 14, 2016 11:19 PM > *To:* ntsysadm > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] core suggestions was- VLAN dhcp issue Netgear > GS748Tv5 > > Yep - I'd certainly prefer the EX4300. Press the vendor on their > reasoning, or just go with another vendor. > > Kurt > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:40 AM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > > the vendor has come back with this recommendation > > http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/switching/ > ex-series/ex3300/ > > <http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/switching/ex-series/ex3300/> > EX3300 Ethernet Switch – Juniper Networks > <http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/switching/ex-series/ex3300/> > www.juniper.net > EX3300 Support for converged data, voice, and video. The EX3300 Ethernet > Switch is a compact, scalable solution for demanding converged enterprise > access environments. > > > > > > this seems (based on the model number) inferior to the EX4300 Kurt > > recommended, and whats worse is that the vendor is asking 3000 USD , > heck, > > Newegg has the ex4300 for less than that > > https://www.neweggbusiness.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item= > 9SIV03829M5844&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleBizMKPL-PC&cm_mmc=KNC- > GoogleBizMKPL-PC-_-pla-_-Network+-+Switches-_-9SIV03829M5844&gclid=CIHh_ > qf6js8CFVNZhgodO-MOeA > > > > Unless I'm missing something, I don't see why anyone would choose the > 3300 > > over the 4300 considering the prices > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:38:57 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] core suggestions was- VLAN dhcp issue Netgear > > GS748Tv5 > > To: [email protected] > > > > I'd take a hard look at a Juniper EX4300-48, but if money is a real > sticking > > point, then look at the specs on an HP switch or a Ubiquiti. > > > > Kurt > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:21 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes lots of cad Vectorworks for the production dept (15 users) amd > lots > > of video editing, However, the video is done on a rendering pc, once.its > > completed , it goes back to the.synology > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:00:15 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] core suggestions was- VLAN dhcp issue Netgear > > GS748Tv5 > > To: [email protected] > > > > Any CAD or video editing, or similar high-bandwidth data movers? > > > > If not, then most anything will work. > > > > Do you have a personal preference for any brand? That is, are you well > > experienced with a particular brand of switch, or are you relatively > > inexperienced with switches? > > > > If you have a preference, stick with it. If not, I'd suggest either HP or > > Ubiquiti. > > > > If the environment has big data movers, then check the backplane capacity > > for the various switches, and you might consider Juniper as well as HP or > > Ubiquiti. > > > > I'm becoming more a fan of Juniper all the time, but they aren't much > like > > Cisco or HP. > > > > Cisco would be my last resort, because of price more than anything else - > > they're otherwise fine switches. > > > > Kurt > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:33 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Currently flat, > > 60 workstations, 60 phones, 12 printers > > 8 AP's, about 12 poe door buzzers, pa's and they will be getting 12 ip > > cameras > > > > A couple of synology that have 4 1gb nic > > > > i site to site > > > > 4 physical servers, 2 of them hyperv (hosting 4 vms each ) both > servers > > have 4 1 gb nics, > > > > primary internet is 100mb > > backup internet is 25mb > > > > about 20 concurrent remote users > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:09:50 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] core suggestions was- VLAN dhcp issue Netgear > > GS748Tv5 > > To: [email protected] > > > > How complex is the environment, how many staff are supported, how many > > VLANs, how much data moves across the LAN, what's the peak throughput, > etc? > > > > Kurt > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:49 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Got approval for new core, > > > > Im thinking Cisco or Procurve , > > givem that all other switches are netgear and only have 1gb sfp uplink > > ports does anyone have suggestions, opinions , reccomendations ? > > > > TiA > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5 > > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:23:04 +0000 > > > > Core sort of implies layer 3. > > > > -- > > There are 10 kinds of people in the world... > > those who understand binary and those who don't. > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <[email protected]>] > > On Behalf Of J- P > > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:17 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5 > > > > Hmm, hack, alternative , not words i feel comfy with when its a core > > switch - > > > > maybe I'll get them to buy something better > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:50:37 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5 > > To: [email protected] > > Its been a long time since I've come across an equipment situation like > > this, but I've seen it before. When planned for, its a way to spend less > on > > your equipment. Unfortunately, sometimes people get caught in a > situation > > realizing the hard-way, that they are missing some expected > functionality. > > > > As a last resort, I'd look into somehow hacking/activating the > > functionality. Perhaps an alternate firmware can be forced on it. > > > > > > -- > > Espi > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:53 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Looks like you hit the nail on the head, per this article i need either a > > 2nd switch, or use the firewall > > > > https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/26167971/ > Netgear-GS748T-setting-up-several-VLAN's-but-having- > DHCP-broadcasting-across-all-ports.html > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:16:10 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5 > > To: [email protected] > > Hi J-P, > > > > I didnt really see a question in your initial post, but if I'm > understanding > > your frustration correctly: If there are no DHCP helper options, I dont > see > > how this could work. DHCP is a broadcast protocol, and needs a helper > > mechanism to cross networks. I can only assume that this model is a > > lower-tiered option that is meant to be stacked with a higher-tiered > managed > > switch. > > > > I saw a similarly themed question posted here: > > > > https://community.netgear.com/t5/Smart-Plus-Click-Switches/ > Why-have-none-of-Netgear-s-L2-switches-a-DHCP-relay-agent/td-p/500749 > > > > > > > > -- > > Espi > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:29 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Anyone, Bueller, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jean-Paul Natola > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5 > > Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 19:47:11 -0400 > > Hi all, > > > > I've been testing VLAN on a GS748tv5 I emphasize v5 as netgear tends > to > > create different devices and only differentiate them by the version , > as a > > matter of fact this device does not have a "ip-helper, or dhcp relay" > > options (yes I know, its old , and crappy anyway), > > > > So I created vlan5 , assigned it an IP 192.168.5.1 , added the firewall > > port and test pc port to the vlan and since I have no option for > ip-helper > > or DHCP relay, the PC received no ip address (and yes, I did create the > DHCP > > scope 192.168.5.x on my 08r2 server, ) > > > > If I give the pc a static address (i.e 192.168.5.x ) I can then > > successfully ping 192.168.5.1 , further research said to enable DHCP > option > > 82 on the DHCP server; > > https://www.google.com/search?q=dhcp+option+82&ie=&oe= > > > > which of course doesn't exist in 08, so I tried to manually create option > > 82, still no joy- > > > > if anyone can share any thoughts it would be greatly appreciated > > > > and before anyone asks, there is no CLI, no Shell, no Terminal on this > POS > > switch > > > > > > > > Jean-Paul Natola > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
