Well, you were obvious much more motivated and had more time to search than
I did.

Good find.

Kurt

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Christopher Bodnar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> OK, based on this, I think he is correct:
>
>
>
> I’ve been running a WireShark trace on a few DCs today (2008 domains and
> 2012 domains), and not seeing any UDP 88 traffic. I did find this:
>
>
>
>
>
> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738673(v=ws.10).aspx
>
>
>
> So basically since Vista, and 2008, if a Kerberos packet is over 1 byte
> (which will be everything) it will send it as TCP instead of UDP, since
> this registry key now is part of the operating system.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Kurt Buff
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:53 PM
> *To:* ntsysadm <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Kerberos over UDP on Windows 10 and Server 2012
> R2
>
>
>
> I'd ask that colleague where he got the idea. I'm not seeing any
> documentation on this either.
>
> But, I did see this, which is interesting, even if unrelated:
> http://blogs.msmvps.com/acefekay/2016/11/01/active-directory-flexible-
> authentication-secure-tunneling-fast/
>
> Kurt
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Christopher Bodnar <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> A colleague told me that these operating systems no longer use UDP 88 for
> Kerberos, that they only use TCP. Is that correct? If so, can someone point
> me to an MS document that discusses this? I’ve looked and haven’t been able
> to find anything.  I am aware that you can force Kerberos to use TCP:
>
>
>
>
>
> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/244474
>
>
>
> But that isn’t what he is talking about.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> *Christopher Bodnar*
> Enterprise Architect II, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
> Architecture and Engineering Services
>
> Tel 610-807-6459
> 3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> * The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America*
>
> * www.guardianlife.com <http://www.guardianlife.com/>*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ----------------------------------------- This message, and any
> attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this
> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
> message and any attachments. Thank you.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------- This message, and any
> attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this
> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
> message and any attachments. Thank you.
>
>

Reply via email to