I have no answer, but this is a project I'll be taking up in the new
year, so I'll be very interested in following this conversation.

Kurt

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Miller Bonnie L.
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I feel like I must be missing a step here, so am hoping someone has seen
> this.  I’m most of the way through standing up a new internal CA
> root/subordinate combo for our internal AD and migrating certificates, but
> have run into a problem with code signing certs.
>
>
>
> The new servers are 2012 R2, done mostly to best practice with root not in
> the domain (offline) and subordinate in the domain for issuing certs.  The
> old single server is 2008 R2.  I already have most of our certs migrated and
> working, including those for Kerberos (Domain controllers) authentication,
> client pcs, web server, etc.  The Root CA is showing up in the client’s
> Trusted root store, and both the root and subordinate are in the
> Intermediate Certificates store.
>
>
>
> I’ve published a new template for (powershell) code signing today from the
> new intermediate server, and was able to follow all of the same steps to get
> a cert enrolled for my user account that I had done with 2008 R2.  I see the
> new cert in the Personal store and have imported it into Trusted publishers.
>
>
>
> But, if I sign some code with the new cert, I still get prompted by
> powershell with “Do you want to run software from this untrusted
> publisher?”.  I’ve tried deleting the old cert from Personal and from
> Trusted publishers, and even re-signed the code to verify it’s using the new
> one that I think it is.
>
>
>
> Is there another place I need to be adding the cert that I’m missing here?
> Is there an issue with signing it from the Intermediary vs the root CA when
> it comes to code signing?
>
>
>
> I’m not a PS guru and there are really only two of us using this, in an
> attempt to not allow unrestricted PS on our domain workstations.  Code
> signing certs have worked fine from our 2008 R2, but there is only the one
> server involved.
>
>
>
> Any pointers would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> -Bonnie


Reply via email to