You need smaller VMs Regards,
ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Providing Expert Technology Consulting Services for the SMB market… GPG:860D 40A1 4DA5 3AE1 B052 8F9F 07A1 F9D6 A549 8842 On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 2:07 PM, Webster [email protected] wrote: I have two Synology units in my lab. The second one I splurged and went all 1TB SSD. Made a HUGE difference in my lab. I can now run over 20 VMs concurrently. With spinning disks, the other NAS died at 5 VMs and was basically unusable at 4. Thanks Carl Webster Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com The Accidental Citrix Admin From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jesse Rink Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [NTSysADM] Opinions on reasonably inexpensive NAS storage In the past, we’ve used a lot of Netgear ReadyNAS models for cheap (sub $1,800) entry level NAS storage, mostly for the purpose of backup storage with Veeam. Been very popular in the past with our SMB sized customers. Lately some of my team/engineers have noticed various problems/crashes with the Netgear units so I’m curious what other options out there people have had good success with. These are situations where a customer doesn’t want to spend a lot of money of disk storage, so enterprise class storage is completely out. Think along the lines of, 4 or 8 disks, SATA, no SAN connectivity, just NAS… Thoughts? Jesse Rink Source One Technology, Inc. HP Partner 262 993 2231 Website |Blog |LinkedIn |Twitter
