There is one thing I just thought of. Is the GPO link enabled in the OU
that is applicable to the user? I’m noticing that if the link is disabled,
the report shows the GPO as being applied but shows none of the settings.
Sounds like your exact behavior. In the report there’s nothing that says
whether or not it’s linked as far as I can see so you’d have to actually
check the OU (or parent OU or whatever is applicable).



There’s also the possibility of Block Inheritance on the user’s OU, but I
don’t think you would see the GPO as applied in in the report if that were
the case.



*From:* [email protected] [mailto:
[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 25, 2017 2:13 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Group Policy question



I have an auditing software that can tell me where a user logged in.  I ran
that on the user in question and myself.  We have not been logging in on
the same DC, but I did look at both of the DCs that we were using, and
compared the policy folder timestamp there with the timestamp on my main GP
management server.  The timestamps are all the same.  That said, if I’m
looking at the GPO, on Details tab, it shows Modified with a timestamp of
yesterday.  The timestamp on the policy GUID folder in
sysvol\domain\Policies is from April of 2016.  Am I looking in the wrong
place, or does that sound odd?  Also, I did run repadmin /showrepl, and
repadmin /replsummary, and neither of those had any errors.



*From:* [email protected] [
mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
Behalf Of *Charles F Sullivan
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 25, 2017 9:47 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Group Policy question



I’m pretty stumped, but maybe you could try making sure that when you run
GPMC for the other user, that it uses the same DC as when you run it for
yourself to confirm it’s not something like a replication issue.



Alternatively, get the GUID for the GPO, then check the respective folder
under SYSVOL on each DC to make sure that gpt.ini has the same time stamp
on each one. (Assuming you don’t have a large number of DCs to check!)



Also, if you could maybe inconvenience the user to log on to your
workstation so that a profile is created, then you would be able to choose
that account for the user settings next time you run RSOP.



*From:* [email protected] [mailto:
[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 25, 2017 11:58 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Group Policy question



The settings themselves are not being applied.  The last time group policy
was processed:  1/25/2017 8:26:02 AM (from summary page)



Under Applied GPOs, the policy in question is listed as applied.  The odd
thing is this:



[image: cid:[email protected]]



I’m wondering what the Revisions are off.  If I look at the GPO itself, on
the Details tab, it shows the same revision in AD and sysvol.  On the
specific policy I’m looking at (CDFW Proxy Policy), there are no WMI
filters.  It’s linked to 2 OUs, not in a direct path of each other, and it
is applied to Authenticated Users.  The above is for a user, on their
machine.  If I run the same report for me on my machine, I do have the
settings applied, the settings do appear in the report, and the revision
info is as above.



This is not a new policy.  It was created 9/1/2015, and it is used to set
the proxy settings in IE.  It has been working well since it was created,
but in the past couple of days, I’ve heard of a couple of users that it is
no longer working for.



*From:* [email protected] [
mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
Behalf Of *Charles F Sullivan
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 25, 2017 7:17 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Group Policy question



Is it only that the reporting is wrong, or does the user also not get the
settings applied?



When you run the Results Wizard from GPMC on the Summary tab are there any
errors and does it show a recent time stamp for the last user policy
refresh? On the Details tab under User Details > Applied GPOs, if you show
the details for the GPO in question does everything look right? Are there
any Security Filters or WMI Filters that might affect the user? (Possibly
certain permissions like Allow Read but not Apply GP might cause this, but
I’m not certain.)



*From:* [email protected] [mailto:
[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 24, 2017 5:25 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Group Policy question



OK.  I’ve done the Group Policy Results wizard for the user in question on
their PC, and for myself on my PC.  I have the policy applied correctly,
the user does not.  The Group Policy Results wizard shows the policy in
question is applied, but the settings don’t show up in the report.



*From:* [email protected] [
mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
Behalf Of *Charles F Sullivan
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:31 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Group Policy question



It worked correctly for me when I tried to reproduce the problem. Try the
Group Policy Results Wizard in the GPMC for the same user to see if you get
different results. The HTML output is better there anyway.



*From:* [email protected] [mailto:
[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 24, 2017 3:50 PM
*To:* 'NT System Admin Issues Discussion list' <[email protected]
>
*Subject:* [NTSysADM] Group Policy question



What would cause gpresult /USER jsmith /R to show a specific group policy
as being applied, but if you do a gpresult /USER jsmith /H c:\test.html,
the report does not show any of the settings of that policy?



Joe Heaton

Information Technology Operations Branch

Data and Technology Division

CA Department of Fish and Wildlife

1700 9th Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, CA  95811

Desk:  (916) 323-1284



Every Californian should conserve water.  Find out how at:

[image: SaveOurWater_Logo] <http://saveourwater.com/>

SaveOurWater.com <http://saveourwater.com/> · Drought.CA.gov
<http://drought.ca.gov/>

Reply via email to