I haven't spent a whole lot of time looking at them, but at one client, I've seen two instances (out of about 9 or 10) where they appeared to be created properly but would not allow more than 170GB of info to be written to the volume in question.
This is on Windows 2012 R2. I'm currently not that big of a fan until I see more. The Windows 2016 storage implementation seems better, but we'll see. Regards, *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>* *Providing Expert Technology Consulting Services for the SMB market…* * GPG: *860D 40A1 4DA5 3AE1 B052 8F9F 07A1 F9D6 A549 8842 On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Katherine M. Moss < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m looking for some open minded folks on here who can possibly provide > validation for both sides of this argument. I tend to prefer storage spaces > simply because they are so simple to configure and they don’t require a set > of eyes to read BIOS screens. I know some people on the other hand who are > either creatures of habbit, or they don’t see the benefits of storage > spaces, or they see it as inferior to RAID. What do you guys think? I am > familiar with Dell configurations if that matters. >
