Doesn't that do something from memory as well? Even with Windows Server core? I thought so. I just never knew how much of a difference it made.
Sent from Nine<http://www.9folders.com/> ________________________________ From: Damien Solodow <[email protected]> Sent: Jun 1, 2017 17:06 To: [email protected] Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux? Depends on what you're trying to do. :) I'd *much* rather run a domain controller on server core than under Samba on Linux. Same thing with file/print, and you can run IIS on core. DAMIEN SOLODOW IT Engineering Lead 317.447.6033 (office) HARRISON COLLEGE From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux? Hey all, Just had to ask this one. I'm really curious because I've heard the argument, well, if you're going to run server Core, why not just use linux? What can you say to make the conversation worthwhile and not just arguing preferences? Or is that really what it's all about these days? Iv'e been wondering what the people who have been on both sides might say.
