I haven't tried it on a RDS box but my gut says it "should" work. I'm in
meetings all day tomorrow but I'll see about setting up a test VM with RDS
services to see what happens.


Regards,
Tony

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Debora Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:

> Tony
>
> Interesting indeed. I have never used this way. Do you think it would work
> for a terminal server environment?
>
> Deb
>
> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Tony Burrows <
> [email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, September 8, 2017 at 10:49
> To: NT Sys Admin <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Group Policy - Enforce screensaver and password
>
> ​I recall something about this method being deprecated in the future and
> Microsoft is pushing people to use the Machine inactivity limit ​setting
> instead.
>
> Computer Configuration > Policies > Windows Settings > Security Settings >
> Local Policies / Security Options > Other > Interactive logon: Machine
> inactivity limit. After the number of seconds of inactivity set in this
> policy, the computer will lock. No other settings are needed to get this to
> work. You could set the screensaver policy too if you want but it isn't
> needed.
>
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Michael Leone <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Below is a picture of what we do We just lock the screen. Doesn't
>> matter if the user chooses a screensaver or not - the screen locks after
>> 900 seconds (too long in my opinion, but it quelled the screaming).
>> >
>> >
>> > AH HA. That's the sort of thing I was looking for. That command does
>> lock the screen, no need to worry whether a screensaver was set or not. So
>> while it's not a "real" screensaver, it does serve the ultimate purpose
>> (locking the machine, and requiring a password to unlock).
>> >
>> > Thanks so much! This seems to be working in my testing.
>>
>>
>> Glad to hear it. I can't remember where I found it, but it was a good
>> day when I did.
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to