TO be more precise - it will work with clients alternately registering, but
every additional registration point makes it exponentially uglier.
------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Kulsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:47 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: End of My Rope with WINS
>
>
> You wrote -
>
> "All clients and other domain controllers are set up using
> their local wins
> server as primary and the remote wins server as secondary. Is
> this OK?"
>
> According to Roger S and many others, it is not Ok. You
> should have same
> WINS server as primary for all subnets. Secondary server can be local
> servers. Primary server would then only push, reducing the
> chance of any
> corruption. (This way WINS configuration approximates DNS
> configuration.)
>
> Jay
> _______
> Jay Kulsh
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Erwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:39 AM
> Subject: End of My Rope with WINS
>
>
> >
> > NT4 Network. I have two buildings, each on their own
> network connected by
> > fiber. Pinging with ip address and netbios name between
> networks is no
> > problem and searching for computers using netbios names
> works too. There
> is
> > a WINS server on each network configured as push and pull
> partners of each
> > other. Each WINS server is its own Primary and Secondary.
> Browsing with
> > Network Neighborhood is intermittent. Sometimes Network A
> sees Network B,
> > sometimes it can't (and vice versa). I've never had
> simultaneous browsing.
> I
> > have never gotten a WINS error in the event viewer. I do
> get successful
> > push/pull entries.
> >
> > All clients and other domain controllers are set up using
> their local wins
> > server as primary and the remote wins server as secondary.
> Is this OK?
> >
> > All the required entries seem to be there [1C], [1Eh], [OOh], etc...
> >
> > I don't know what else to check for, and am close to deleting both
> databases
> > and starting over.
> >
> >
> > Any advice?
> > Scott
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> >
>
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
