Try this: do ping -a 201.167.xxx.xxx and see if the reverse DNS resolves to
the FQHN. This is a normal DNS behavior and should not cause any
difficulties unless there is a specific reason not to want this.

xylog
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niki Blowfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: NetBIOS name resolves to domain name


> The domain that is being resolved, servername.co.uk, is not one of our
> servers
>
> We don't have any DNS servers on our LAN, we use our ISP's
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 August 2001 14:36
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: NetBIOS name resolves to domain name
>
>
>
> Niki:
>
> The ping difference means that DNS (or the hosts file) is resolving the
> one server and WINS (lmhosts file) the other. For example, I have 2
> servers (server01 and server02). I have a DNS namespace of
> div1.company.com. I have both valid WINS server(s) and DNS server(s).
> The 1st server, server01 is registered in DNS and the 2nd is not. My
> client is setup to use DNS to first resolve the name.
>
> When I ping server01, it replies server01.div1.company.com
> [192.168.100.50], when I ping server02 DNS does not have this host name
> so WINS ends up replying with server02 [192.168.100.55]. Either way
> should work and would not matter to Exchange. I would check to make sure
> both servers are properly registered in WINS.
>
> Go to the CMD prompt and type: NBTSTAT -a server01  (your server name
> goes
> here)
>
> You should get a listing at a minimum similar to this:
>            NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table
>
>        Name                   Type                 Status
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>     SERVER02        <00>  UNIQUE         Registered
>     DOM01                <00>  GROUP          Registered
>     SERVER02        <20>  UNIQUE         Registered
>
>     MAC Address = 99-99-99-99-99-99
>
> The first <00> is the unique computername registration by the
> workstation service. The other <00> group is the domain name registered
> saying that this computer is a member of this domain or workgroup. The
> <20> unique is registered by the server service I believe. You may
> certainly have other entries besides these, especially if the one server
> is the PDC.
>
> I would double check your WINS settings and make sure the servers are
> both registered properly in WINS. Whether the ping to a server is
> answered by WINS or DNS should not matter to the NetBIOS resolution for
> the Exchange server you are trying to add. Pinging any server in my
> organization will always give you a servername.div1.company.com answer
> to the ping.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>                     Niki Blowfield
>
>                     <niki.blowfield@partit        To:     "NT System
> Admin Issues"
>                     ion.co.uk>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                                                   cc:
>
>                     08/24/2001 07:56 AM           Subject:     Netbios
> name resolves to domain name
>                     Please respond to "NT
>
>                     System Admin Issues"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> We have an NT4 Domain, with one Exchange 5.5 server on the PDC.
>
> I have attempted to install another Exchange server into the site, but
> the installation fails at the end, with an error asking me to check if
> the directory service is started.
>
> The service is started, so upon investigation of technet, it mentions
> name resolution on the two servers.
>
> I have checked, and when I ping the server name of the server I'm trying
> to install, it resolves it to a domain name. e.g.;
>
> ping NEWEXCHSERVER
>
> pinging NEWEXCHSERVER.CO.UK [201.167.xxx.xxx]
>
> etc etc
>
> Whereas, if I ping the other way, it works okay. e.g.
>
> ping EXISTINGEXCSERVER
>
> pinging EXISTINGEXCSERVER [192.168.2.25]
>
> etc
>
> I have entered the new server into the lmhosts file of the exchange
> server and rebooted, but no difference.
>
> could this be the problem? if so, any ideas on a resolution
>
> Nik
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to