It will simply be data storage for our production department - GBs of crap,
I mean, very important files. I'll check out your link.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Hard drive configuration
>>If not, what would be the best
>>configuration for the drives.
What will the machine be doing?
See the following:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=ServerSpecs.TXT
>>I was thinking of adding a single drive
>>on the build-in controller for the OS and
>>using the other 6 for data storage.
Why deliberately introduce a single point of failure into a system
that also has duplexed drives?
==============================================================
ASB - http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=~MoreInfo.TXT
==============================================================
"All generalizations are bad."
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:58 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: Hard drive configuration
>
>
>I currently have a NetWare server with 6 Seagate ST39175LW
>drives on 2
>Adaptec controllers in a duplexed configuration. We are
>going to rebuild
>the server as NT 4.0. I don't think NT can mirror the
>drives in a duplexed
>configuration like the one we currently have. Am I wrong.
>If not, what
>would be the best configuration for the drives. I was
>thinking of adding a
>single drive on the build-in controller for the OS and using
>the other 6 for
>data storage. I'm just not sure how I should configure the
>other drives.
>
>Thanks, Michelle
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
