Mmmm....don't see the point, really.  SSH provides a shell that has all
of the functionality and then some, why use telnet?  Am I missing
something?

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: telnet client


Something wrong with telnet over SSH?  I wouldn't suggest anything less.

William


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: telnet client


I would forgo telnet in favor of Secure Shell.

http://www.ssh.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: telnet client


Any suggestions for an alternative telnet client for Win2k?

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to