I read a MS whitepaper a few weeks back that said if you are hitting 2
often, you have a processor problem. It's was a Win2k white paper, but I
think it applies to NT4 as well.
I was averaging 2, added a second processor and now average 0.
~Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: Flanagan, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Monitoring servers
Processor queues are always bad, I wouldn't think that the expected queue
length should have changed from NT4 to 2K.
Anywhere > 1.5 gets my attention.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Kevin Flanagan
C/S Planning Engineer III
I/T Implementation Department
Branch Banking & Trust Company
3261 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 116
MC: 172-85-01-00
Raleigh, NC 27604
Voice: 919-716-6209
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Reimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Monitoring servers
Hi folks,
In the NT 4.0 world, processor queue length was supposed to be at 2 or below
(for the most part). In Win2K, experience tells me that 3 is fairly normal.
We've got a few servers running Win2K server, and various CPU's, memory etc,
but they all seem to get to 3 quite a bit (even simple file and print
servers).
Have other people seen this? I tried to find the official word from MS about
this, but it looks like the rehash of NT 4.0 stuff, and not updated.
Comments??
Mark
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
