We are right now at or near 99% no solution will be able to pass that
number unless it is to perhaps add another .9 but that is still not
100%. leavening an openness for someone with the funding and motivation.
It is like using a condom, the pill, a depo shot, a diaphragm and the
pullout method. There is still a chance. And with that much junk in the
way who is going to want to have sex?
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Kevin Miller wrote:
> ... adding to what we have now will only harm the industry and freedom
> of transpiration we currently have ...
Justification for your conclusions?
The government is already responsible for providing security in most
public safety matters. I believe that makes sense -- anything else is a
conflict of interest. You cannot ask, e.g., a food distributor to
regulate themselves, as they are motivated (and rightly so) by profit,
not the public well-being. Why are the skies different?
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
| not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person,
| entity or | organization. All information is provided without
| warranty of any kind. |
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
