It is hard to tell when a question has been answered. I sent a response to a question early this morning, but my response didn't hit the server for quite a while. By the time it did hit, there had already been several responses from other list members. (Which I think is great!!) One thing that I do like to see is when a question gets answered that the question sender sends a response letting everyone know that he has resolved his issue. This will kill the thread. I have noticed that some people do not do this and the question keeps getting answered. It is not a perfect animal, but WELL worth the time.
-----Original Message-----
From: TDI Custom Computers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Fw: Repetitive posts
> Which is why I sort by thread, rather than by time stamp.
> Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alavan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:01 AM
> Subject: Repetitive posts
>
>
> > This list is high volume. But much of that can be cured by people
reading
> > the rest of the posts to see if the question's been answered already -
> > before they post their answer.
> >
> > Case in point: there must've been 20 "Memphis" responses to the Win98
Code
> > name question and a similar number of responses to the 'Safe Mode' key
> > question.
> >
> > Please, let's keep this list manageable.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alavan
> >
> >
> > Want to unsub? Do that here:
> >
>
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmin&text_mod
> e=0&lang=english
> >
> >
>
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
