Funny how all the long-time, decent contributors think the same as Carl. Maybe it has something to do with what you post, and the way you post it.
Cheers Ken From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 1 January 2008 7:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SonicWall NAT'ing question Gee Carl, I thought you were a reasonable man, sorry to read this from you. :( From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 12:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SonicWall NAT'ing question Um, when are we going to learn to ignore the trolls? Feeding them (by responding) is what they live for. Ignore them and they'll become bored and go away. One has to wonder if this particular troll doesn't get some benefit ($ payment from somebody) for stirring up this conversation every now and then, since it happens almost like clockwork. ________________________________ From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 12:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SonicWall NAT'ing question Dr. Shinder, Despite what you seem to want to believe there are other equally good (Even better, IMHO) firewalls out there that come in appliances. That's not to say that ISA isn't a good product, as it has it's uses, but so do SonicWall, Watchguard and Checkpoint products. If you can't add to a discussion in a way that helps the poster resolve their problem, I would suggest you refrain from posting, if only to keep guys like Mr. Ely and Mr. Shook from grabbing pitchforks and torches and stirring up the locals into a mob looking to put your neck in a noose.... Again. From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SonicWall NAT'ing question ASA? ACK! Why didn't you use an ISA firewall? Much more secure and many fewer security issues. Only a fool would use an ASA, IMHO. HTH, Tom From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 2:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SonicWall NAT'ing question SonicWall Pro 1260 w/enhanced OS I need to configure this box to NAT/PAT for a new network (10.101.2.x/24) I just brought online. This sonicwall is only going to be in service for a few more weeks, as I'm migrating to a new ASA 5510. I did figure out the routing on the sonicwall so it can get to the aforementioned network but nodes on that network can't get to the Internet. Do I create a new NAT policy? What am I missing? Shook http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
