If NAV v.9 being a resource hogging piece of [EMAIL PROTECTED] was Symantec's only offense...then I might change my opinion. But there isn't a product that they have assimilated (that I can recall) that they haven't pretty much destroyed within 2 years. I think I see a pattern here. ;-)
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: R: Nod32 v3 or 2.7? Not likely from my experience but then I do not like to forgive companies the mess up my network after taking my money. Jon On Jan 4, 2008 10:52 AM, HELP_PC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And I think that people who really experienced last Symantec Endpoint Protection should change a bit their mind about the company and their software GuidoElia HELPPC ________________________________ Da: Eric E Eskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: venerdì 4 gennaio 2008 16.46 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Nod32 v3 or 2.7? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/03/2008 05:48:46 PM: > DFS, AD Replicaton, Kerberos errors, UNC drive access, all stops working > after version 3. And this is better then Symantec? Sounds like trading one set of issues for another :/ Eric Eskam =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The contents of this message are mine personally and do not reflect any position of the U.S. Government "The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange protein; it rejects it." - P. B. Medawar ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
