Loopback processing needs enabling Sent from my POS BlackBerry wireless device, which may wipe itself at any moment
-----Original Message----- From: David Lum <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:25:19 To: NT System Admin Issues<[email protected]> Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]>Subject: GPO inheritance puzzler 1. At the root of my domain I have a GPO to enable screen saver and set the timeout. Link is enabled but not enforced. 2. Lower down in my OU tree is an OU with blocked inheritance in it, and linked to that OU is a GPO to disable the screensaver. If I look at GP Inheritance on this OU I see what I'd expect - the enforced GPO's and the one GPO disable screensaver GPO. In theory the screensaver should be disabled. Both GPO's have the user configuration set for the screensaver If I run GP modeling on a system in this blocked inheritance OU, the GPO that enables screensaver and sets timeout shows up as an applied GPO, and the settings tab shows that the screensaver enabled and settings. Both GPO's have "authenticated users" in security filtering. How does the root one win out over being blocked and the OU-specific GPO in its place? David Lum Systems Engineer // NWEATM Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
