As usual, you guys are money. I did not run GPRESULT on this system, but 
enabling the l loopback took care of it for me, thanks so much!

Dave

From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GPO inheritance puzzler

If you run GPRESULT on this system, does it show that the GPO to enable screen 
saver is applied?

What you should be seeing is that this GPO is filtered out similar to this:



The following GPOs were not applied because they were filtered out
-------------------------------------------------------------------
    ScreenSaver_Disable_GPO
        Filtering:  Not Applied (Unknown Reason)


Also, I agree that LoopBack processing should be enabled on the GPO, but I 
don't think that is your problem right now.

YMMV


Chris Bodnar, MCSE, MCITP
Technical Support III
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From:        David Lum <[email protected]>
To:        "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]>
Date:        07/21/2011 02:26 PM
Subject:        GPO inheritance puzzler
________________________________



1.       At the root of my domain I have a GPO to enable screen saver and set 
the timeout. Link is enabled but not enforced.
2.       Lower down in my OU tree is an OU with blocked inheritance in it, and 
linked to that OU is a GPO to disable the screensaver.

If I look at GP Inheritance on this OU I see what I’d expect – the enforced 
GPO’s and the one GPO disable screensaver GPO. In theory the screensaver should 
be disabled. Both GPO’s have the user configuration set for the screensaver

If I run GP modeling on a system in this blocked inheritance OU, the GPO that 
enables screensaver and sets timeout shows up as an applied GPO, and the 
settings tab shows that the screensaver enabled and settings.

Both GPO’s have “authenticated users” in security filtering. How does the root 
one win out over being blocked and the OU-specific GPO in its place?
David Lum
Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to