How can it be the "patching" if a subsequent reboot is fine?

Were any patches removed?

Isn't it more likely that something happened during the earlier reboot
(which was associated with the patching) that impacted the functionality?

How many systems were previously rebooted at the same time?

Thx


* *

*ASB* *http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…

*



On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote:

> I blame the patching. I rebooted this server again and everything came back
> to life…****
>
> ** **
>
> Dave****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 22, 2011 9:24 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: MS Patch fallout****
>
> ** **
>
> Here’s one.****
>
> ** **
>
> I have a web server that before we patched it that worked fine. We patched
> and now from the machine itself the url works (http://webaddress)****
>
> But from a client machine the IP works (http://ipofwebserver), but
> http://webaddress no worky, and neither does http://FQDNofwebaddress.****
>
> ** **
>
> Sicne the address works from the machine itself I know the site is OK.****
>
> From a client, pinging webaddress returns the correct IP, pinging FQDN also
> returns the correct IP, so name resolution is OK.****
>
> ** **
>
> It feels like an IIS/IP security issue, where it cares what IP you’re
> coming from to allow access. I know I’ve seen this before and have fixed it,
> but the fix eludes me at the moment..****
>
> ** **
>
> Dave****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Don Kuhlman [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 22, 2011 9:12 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: MS Patch fallout****
>
> ** **
>
> After some more investigation - it seems as though there was a software
> installation on one of the servers with issues that required a reboot before
> the patches were applied.  Our DR server is fine - which didn't get the
> application installed on it but did get it's patches. So we're going to
> recover and restore the prod server with the issues and go from there.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks for the insights folks...****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Christopher Bodnar <[email protected]>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 22, 2011 9:47 AM
> *Subject:* Re: MS Patch fallout****
>
> Can't say I've seen that here. How much of your environment is affected?
> Every patch cycle I see a few servers that need an extra reboot to clear
> this type of issue, but it's never been widespread.
>
>
>
>
> Chris Bodnar, MCSE, MCITP
> Technical Support III
> Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
> Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
> Email: [email protected]
> Phone: 610-807-6459
> Fax: 610-807-6003
>
>
>
> From:        Don Kuhlman <[email protected]>
> To:        "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]
> >
> Date:        08/22/2011 09:32 AM
> Subject:        MS Patch fallout ****
>
>
>
>
> Hi folks. Has anyone seen any issues with the Microsoft August patches
> affecting RDP access on Windows 2003 servers or terminal servers?
> Getting issues after patching yesterday with some 2003 servers won't allow
> RDP access now.
> Thanks
> Don K ****
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to