Can't believe that AppSense AM isn't in there as one of the test subjects.
I think the issue is that most people use them for the Environment Manager
(EM) feature of the suite so AppSense are treated more as a competitor in
the UEM (User Environment Management) market rather than against other
applications that do whitelisting, but the whitelisting product is (IMHO)
their strongest. If they were willing to run the rule over AppLocker for
that survey, then AM should surely have been included - most people who
work with Application Manager brand it as "AppLocker on steroids", which is
slightly unfair seeing though it can do a lot more feature-wise.

On 15 November 2011 16:07, Stu Sjouwerman <[email protected]> wrote:

> ****
>
> Anyone experience with Lumension? This seems to be one of the bigger
> players.****
>
> Did some testing with this perhaps?****
>
> ** **
>
> Warm regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Stu ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Joseph Heaton [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:47 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Whitelisting Pros & Cons?****
>
> ** **
>
> Would it be better to have a tool that only does whitelisting, or a
> software more like Viewfinity, where you can do both white and black lists,
> and also elevate permissions for applications that aren't on either list,
> but are needed by a few people, which wouldn't warrant putting it on the
> whitelist?
>
> >>> Stu Sjouwerman <[email protected]> 11/14/2011 2:16 PM >>>****
>
> Thanks Micheal. Anyone experience with any of the Whitelisting products in
> this InfoWorld Review?****
>
> ** **
>
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/test-center-review-whitelisting-security-offers-salvation-835?
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *Bit9 Parity Suite 5.01*
>
> *10*
>
> *8*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *10*
>
> *9.4*
>
> *EXCELLENT*
>
> *30%*
>
> *15%*
>
> *25%*
>
> *10%*
>
> *20%*
>
> *CoreTrace Bouncer 5*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *8*
>
> *9*
>
> *8.9*
>
> *VERY GOOD*
>
> *30%*
>
> *15%*
>
> *25%*
>
> *10%*
>
> *20%*
>
> *Lumension Application Control*
>
> *8*
>
> *9*
>
> *8*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *8.5*
>
> *VERY GOOD*
>
> *30%*
>
> *15%*
>
> *25%*
>
> *10%*
>
> *20%*
>
> *McAfee Application Control 5.0*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *8*
>
> *8*
>
> *8.7*
>
> *VERY GOOD*
>
> *30%*
>
> *15%*
>
> *25%*
>
> *10%*
>
> *20%*
>
> *SignaCert Enterprise Trust Services 3.0*
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2011 5:10 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Whitelisting Pros & Cons?****
>
> ** **
>
> Whitelisting is the future IMHO.  You cant trust anything anymore.  Faith
> doesnt cut it.  You have to protect yourself and your assets, and
> whitelisting is the best way to do it.
>
> --
> Espi****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Stu Sjouwerman <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> I'm referring to Whitelisting in the context of security.  About 10 years
> ago, the ratio
> "Good code" versus malware was perhaps 90 good 10 bad.  In that scenario,
> it makes
> sense to keep the bad code out. But over the last 10 years, with automated
> malware
> variant generation, the tables have turned, and there is actually more
> malware than
> good code out there. So in -that- scenario it might make sense to only
> allow "good code"
> and implement application control. Only that which is allowed, will run.
>
> I'd like your feedback - input - discussion on this !
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Stu****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 11:22 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues****
>
> Subject: Re: Whitelisting Pros & Cons?
>
> Are you asking about web content filtering, email filtering, or some other
> type of "whitelisting?"
>
>
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School District
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stu Sjouwerman
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Mon, 14 Nov 2011
> 08:14:57 -0800
> Subject: Whitelisting Pros & Cons?****
>
> > Guys, I am writing an article for WServerNews, and would like your
> > public input.
> >
> > What is your experience with Whitelisting, which products you
> > tried/use, and what experience you are having with this, likes and hates
> are all welcome !!
> >
> > Warm regards,
> >
> > Stu
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
> ** **
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>



-- 
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
a question."

****** IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER *****

This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed.
If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and
therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you.
However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you
probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a
mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and
destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken
this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer,
because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide
afterwards, but I am starting to digress...... *

*The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the
information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a
pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But
should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it,
and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However,
if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding
liability for transmission.
*

*In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then
please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's
brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately
refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought
when you went to Pets** **At Home yesterday. *

*We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are
running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the
event that you do get this message then please note that we take no
responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or
implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of receiving,
or not, as the case may be, from time to time, notwithstanding all
liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where was I...umm, no matter
what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! *

*The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my
employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side
of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon
tea. *

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to