The greater the flexibility of the tool, the less tools you need to manage
your security.

Relying on 1 tool is not wise, but having to manage 12 slightly overlapping
tools is its own nightmare.

Getting it down to 3 or 4 tools is useful.

* *

*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…

*



On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Joseph Heaton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Would it be better to have a tool that only does whitelisting, or a
> software more like Viewfinity, where you can do both white and black lists,
> and also elevate permissions for applications that aren't on either list,
> but are needed by a few people, which wouldn't warrant putting it on the
> whitelist?
>
> >>> Stu Sjouwerman <[email protected]> 11/14/2011 2:16 PM >>>
>
>  Thanks Micheal. Anyone experience with any of the Whitelisting products
> in this InfoWorld Review?****
>
> ** **
>
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/test-center-review-whitelisting-security-offers-salvation-835?
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *Bit9 Parity Suite 5.01*
>
> *10*
>
> *8*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *10*
>
> *9.4*
>
> *EXCELLENT*
>
> *30%*
>
> *15%*
>
> *25%*
>
> *10%*
>
> *20%*
>
> *CoreTrace Bouncer 5*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *8*
>
> *9*
>
> *8.9*
>
> *VERY GOOD*
>
> *30%*
>
> *15%*
>
> *25%*
>
> *10%*
>
> *20%*
>
> *Lumension Application Control*
>
> *8*
>
> *9*
>
> *8*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *8.5*
>
> *VERY GOOD*
>
> *30%*
>
> *15%*
>
> *25%*
>
> *10%*
>
> *20%*
>
> *McAfee Application Control 5.0*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *9*
>
> *8*
>
> *8*
>
> *8.7*
>
> *VERY GOOD*
>
> *30%*
>
> *15%*
>
> *25%*
>
> *10%*
>
> *20%*
>
> *SignaCert Enterprise Trust Services 3.0*
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2011 5:10 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Whitelisting Pros & Cons?****
>
> ** **
>
> Whitelisting is the future IMHO.  You cant trust anything anymore.  Faith
> doesnt cut it.  You have to protect yourself and your assets, and
> whitelisting is the best way to do it.
>
> --
> Espi****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> ****
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Stu Sjouwerman <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> I'm referring to Whitelisting in the context of security.  About 10 years
> ago, the ratio
> "Good code" versus malware was perhaps 90 good 10 bad.  In that scenario,
> it makes
> sense to keep the bad code out. But over the last 10 years, with automated
> malware
> variant generation, the tables have turned, and there is actually more
> malware than
> good code out there. So in -that- scenario it might make sense to only
> allow "good code"
> and implement application control. Only that which is allowed, will run.
>
> I'd like your feedback - input - discussion on this !
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Stu****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 11:22 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues****
>
> Subject: Re: Whitelisting Pros & Cons?
>
> Are you asking about web content filtering, email filtering, or some other
> type of "whitelisting?"
>
>
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School District
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stu Sjouwerman
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Mon, 14 Nov 2011
> 08:14:57 -0800
> Subject: Whitelisting Pros & Cons?
>
> ****
>
> > Guys, I am writing an article for WServerNews, and would like your
> > public input.
> >
> > What is your experience with Whitelisting, which products you
> > tried/use, and what experience you are having with this, likes and hates
> are all welcome !!
> >
> > Warm regards,
> >
> > Stu
> >
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to