...and the consequences can be somewhat greater at *that* point when you do
resist.



On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> wrote:

> But it takes a lot more effort to resist at *that* point. :)
>
> * *
>
> *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
> Technology for the SMB market…
>
> *
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Mathew Shember <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  It takes less effort to wait until they are kicking down your door.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks,****
>>
>> Mathew****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2011 8:20 AM
>>
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *>>**“1984” is here, and most people couldn’t care less because the
>> benefits of the technology outweigh any privacy concerns.*****
>>
>>
>> And that will continue to be the case until individuals encounter
>> specific situations that impact them personally.  The theoretical dangers
>> will persuade very, very few...
>>
>> ****
>>
>> *ASB*****
>>
>> *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker*****
>>
>> *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market…*****
>>
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:21 AM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote:***
>> *
>>
>> This CarrierIQ thing brings up a thought. With a smartphones and other
>> current technology it is now entirely possible to have your every action
>> recorded. Who you talk to, what you way, what you and they look like, where
>> you are and how long you’ve been there and where you went next and how fast
>> did you travel to get there.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> “1984” is here, and most people couldn’t care less because the benefits
>> of the technology outweigh any privacy concerns.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> The only way to partially “opt out” is to not have a smartphone and drive
>> an older car, because even then when you walk into stores and make
>> purchases you are still being watched by cameras/banks. Using cash would
>> get you a little more stealth****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thoughts?****
>>
>> *David Lum*
>> Systems Engineer // NWEATM
>> Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>



-- 
David

_____________________
*
*
*Under the heading of, "we wish"...

*"I have lived, sir, a long time; and the longer I live, the more
convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of
men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it
probable that an empire can rise without his aid?"

--Benjamin Franklin, Motion for Prayers in the Constitutional Convention,
1787
**

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to