Now we have the exact opposite experience. We were feeding 3-4 sessions over DSL for over a year and it worked just fine. DSL on both ends, which means we only had about 1 meg upload speed. Now that we have 50/25 fiber at the "mothership" it's that much better. I even have engineers using CAD apps on view desktops remotely in a pinch. And we're sill running 4.6.
________________________________ From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: VDI PCoIP is still rubbish when used over an ASDL type service via VPN back to the mothership. I have to use it twice a week remotely and it is extra laggy. Maybe it is the company trying to tell me they don't want me working from home! From: Rankin, James R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 14 December 2011 18:40 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: VDI I wasn't keen on View for remote users. YMMV, but I found PCoIP rubbish remotely. Things may have improved. Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird ________________________________ From: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:42:39 -0500 To: NT System Admin Issues<[email protected]> ReplyTo: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: VDI I agree, Harry. I'd like to justify using View. We haven't got a quote on it yet so a lot depends on how close it is to the Symantec solution. ________________________________ Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:19:54 -0500 Subject: Re: VDI From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> I don't know a thing about CWS and I know you mentioned Citrix but have you looked at their VDI-in-a-Box solution? http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/product.asp?contentID=2316437 I would try my best to somehow justify the price difference to get either VM and Citrix as those two players seem to very active in the VDI space. Which ultimately means easier integration and better support, community or otherwise, for you. Harry. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Due to computerized physician order entry (part of meaningful use), we looking at implementing a virtual desktop solution. I have identified three: Citrix, VM View and Symantec's Corporate Workspace product (used to be Nuvision until it was bought out by Symantec). I am familiar with Citrix and spent a day at a conference on VM, but I have no knowledge (other than what the salesperson showed us) of CWS. Has anybody done any work with the Symantec product? The price is good compared to the other two but we have never purchased an product based on price alone. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. QinetiQ may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security. QinetiQ Limited (Registered in England & Wales: Company Number: 3796233) Registered office: Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX http://www.qinetiq.com. http://www.qinetiq.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
