This is what I expect as well. * *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Kennedy, Jim <[email protected]>wrote: > I would guess to meet their militaries requirements for security/safety > Symantec had to provide it. I would expect that is a pretty standard > practice across most governments. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:53 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Huge Security Breach At Security Firm Symantec No Threat To > Consumers, Analyst Says | Fox News > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I hate to defend Symantec, but the breach wasn't Symantec's. More info > here: > > http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/symantec-source-code-leaked/ > > Okay, do we know why India's military intelligence agency had > Symantec's source code? The article says, "We have ... source codes > of a dozen software companies which have signed agreements with Indian > TANCS programme and CBI." Are they trying to say Symantec had a > source code sharing agreement with the Indians? > > If this just means India stole Symantec's code first, that's not better. > :) > > -- Ben > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
