When one of our 2900s was delivered last year one of the on-board
Broadcom NICs seemed largely dead, ended up needing a motherboard
replacement.  I'll think about mirroring the settings you're using
below, though.  Thanks for the tips.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 12:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Broadcom NIC problems?

This sounds a LOT like the strange issue we had with our 2950 running
E2k7 (can't just wipe and install x32) where Outlook would "hiccup" and
lose connections to the server.  Server appeared hung, but once logged
on, was fine and users could reconnect.  Updated firmware, drivers,
Windows, Exchange patches, etc, and could not find a source.  On the
verge of calling PSS, but tried the chimney stuff first, and voila,
haven't seen the problem since.  We've turned it off for now on all of
our 2900s and 2950s, and have seen great improvements in several servers
where we probably didn't realize there were issues.

On ours, I'm importing a reg file with the following
-------------
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters]
"EnableTCPA"=dword:00000000
"EnableRSS"=dword:00000000
"EnableTCPChimney"=dword:00000000
-------------

And, I'm also setting RSS to disabled in the advanced properties of the
Broadcom NIC (in device manager).  A reboot after that and it's all off.
Will probably try turning things back on one at a time when this issue
seems to settle down more, but at this point, it still appears to be a
problem for us on the latest drivers, etc.

BTW--we have one 2900 server that was so bad we had to stuff an Intel
NIC in the box after it continued to BSOD on Broadcom drivers and Dell
had replaced all the hardware (we changed cables, ports, etc first).
Has worked flawlessly since--hoping to try removing that NIC with the
chimney off soon, but need to wait until mid-winter break when the kids
are gone in case it doesn't work.  Point being, it seems to rear its
ugly head for us with the Broadcom NICs.  YMMV

-Bonnie

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim McAtee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Broadcom NIC problems?

In the IP Chimney thread there was a link to an article that alluded to
more general issues with Broadcom drivers in Win2k3.

I'm seeing some issues with a Dell PE2950 that we recently put into
service as a web server.  I first set the sysetem up using Windows
Server
2003 x64 and had serious network throughput problems.  Even on the local
network (100 Mbps switch) I was seeing no better than about 130 kbps
throughput.  This was (and still is) without the TOE enabled.  I farked
around with it, trying different drivers until I finally gave up and
installed Win2k3 32-bit.  Much better network speeds.

But what I'm seeing is now is an occasional hiccup where a web page
appears to take several seconds to load.  This is actually a little
reminiscent of the original problem, as it would appear that the network
would experience varying speeds, with short periods of a couple seconds
that were extremely slow.

Looking at the page generation speeds, it's not the web or application
server, as the pages take just a fraction of a second to generate.
Everything points to continued networking problems.  Web sites from
other servers in the same web farm don't display this behavior, so it
would seem to be something with the PE2950 and not the network itself.
Anyone else seeing something similar?  Suggestions for either a fix, or
where to begin troubleshooting would be appreciated.


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
___________

The information contained in this E-mail message, including any attached files 
transmitted, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only 
for the sole use of the individual(s) named above. If you are the intended 
recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential or personal information 
may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If you, the reader of this 
message, are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you 
should not further disseminate, distribute or forward this E-mail message. If 
you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the 
material from your computer system. This message is provided for information 
purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell 
any securities or related financial instruments in any jurisdiction.




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to