But, that's not my market, and not Mr's Chyka's either, I suspect.

I'll lay odds that at the lower end, Cisco isn't quite such a deal.

On Jan 29, 2008 1:55 PM, Don Ely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Doesn't make my comment irrelevant at all.  Someone mentioned that you
> needed a new VAR because you got crappy pricing.  Go have a look at what
> list is on the specs I just gave you...
>
> And my feature set blows away the feature set of an HP, but that is because
> my requirements dictate that...
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 1:53 PM, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Which makes your comment on the equipment irrelevant, doesn't it?
> >
> > HP may not be the answer for every question, but in situations where
> > there is equivalence between HP and Cisco, I'll at least consider HP
> > equipment, given their superior warranty and return policies.
> >
> >
> > On Jan 29, 2008 1:49 PM, Don Ely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >  There isn't one...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 29, 2008 1:44 PM, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > And the equivalent HP equipment would cost what?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 29, 2008 1:41 PM, Don Ely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >  Agreed...  I'm getting a 4507 with dual Sup V 10GE engines, 48 port
> gig
> > > > > blade and a 24 port fiber blade for 30k...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jan 29, 2008 12:00 PM, Andy Shook
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kurt,
> >
> >
> > > > > > It all depends on who you talk to.  When designing my new
> > > infrastructure
> >
> >
> > > > > > for our new building, I was able to get Cisco cheaper than HP or
> 3Com.
> >
> >
> > > > > > It's all about who you know and who knows you...everything is
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > > negotiable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andy
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:57 PM
> > > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Switch Purchase Question...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We're going to be upgrading our network infrastructure soon as
> well.
> > > > > > We're definitely not going with Cisco - we're going with HP. I'm
> > > > > > looking for layer 3 stuff, as we have several subnets, but the
> 2800
> > > > > > series for the layer 2 stuff should be great.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Two reasons for that: Warranty/Return policy and pricing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3Com left a bad taste in my mouth when I worked with them back in
> 2001
> > > > > > - I hope they're better now, but I was able to bring a 3Com switch
> to
> > > > > > its knees back then with a simple ping flood.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kurt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 29, 2008 6:13 AM, Chyka, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am looking to upgrade switching for a
> architectural/engineering
> > > firm
> > > > > > here.
> > > > > > > It is a small network with 85 devices on it.  I want to go
> gigabit
> > > and
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > owner probably wont spend the $$$ to get Cisco gear.  I was
> looking
> > > at
> > > > > > 3com
> > > > > > > and HP.  Here are the models I was looking at for each vendor:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3Com Switch 4200G 48-Port 3CR17662-91
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hp ProCurve 2810-48G 48 Port
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is a flat network so I only need a layer 2 device.  It is a
> cad
> > > > > > heavy
> > > > > > > shop and I was wondering which one you would lean toward or if
> there
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > another model you like better by same or different vendor in the
> > > > > > $2500-$3000
> > > > > > > range.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
> > > > > > ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
> > > > > > ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
> > > > ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to