Following this up, I did eventually get a followup email and this is
legitimate.  There are some issues with the report, but that's all part of
the process I'm now in.



On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Link <[email protected]>wrote:

> I received an email purportedly to be from Microsoft about a Software
> Asset Management (SAM) license review (headers looked like it came from MS,
> but I'm not an expert).  They indicated that they were trying to contact me
> this week (it was sent on Tuesday, and the *only* prior contact was a
> misdirected phone call into one of our director's voicemail[1]).
>
> It includes 2 PDFs, one appears to be a report with our name on it, VLPS
> Report, and it appears to have some correct information as to the
> customerID.  There's a deployment summary spreadsheet and a USA FAQ
> 2012.pdf.  Included in the email are some instructions, a suggestion to use
> the Microsoft Assessment and Planning Toolkit to help complete the tasks.
> It includes an email address for [email protected] or to contact
> another person at Microsoft.
>
> The person's display name for contacting me is foreign and has (Accenture)
> in parentheses.  It comes from a microsoft.com email address, however a
> reply back to that address generated an access denied NDR, but a reply to
> the other individual did not.  I haven't received an email (I also
> forwareded the email to the other address) in response, and I would have
> expected a faster turnaround.  The email address did contain a phone
> number, however that phone number, according to 800 notes, has been used in
> several scams in the past, trying to trick people into giving bank account
> information to receive a government grant.  A physical address is given,
> but it is the address to the Microsoft campus in Redmond.
>
> So, I cautiously viewed the documents on my iPhone.  One document, our
> apparent licensing report appears entirely legitimate.  I have had a weak
> password on the eopen site for a while, just hadn't bothered changing it.
> Second PDF (USA FAQ 2012[2]) is not viewable on my iPhone, it just displays
> whitespace, as does the excel file.  I'm going to take them to a sandboxed
> computer to view them later.  They also want information returned by April
> 16th.
>
> My other concern is some limited googling has suggested that this might be
> legitimate, that Microsoft has engaged in third parties to do this, and
> that there are variations of this process, but those could be cleverly
> built forums with shills indicating the process is legit, so I turn to this
> list for advice.  In the body of the email there aren't any instructions on
> where to send the information.  If the sender can only send email, having
> another address to receive this information seems to be necessary.
>
>
> [1] The voicemail was extremely static laden and had several gaps in it.
> [2] That's a poorly named FAQ and about the only poorly phrased or worded
> item in the email.
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to