Loopback processing always ups the confusion for me (so I could be way
off), but isn't that the likely reason for it?  Loopback processing says
to use the policy applied to the computer, not the user, so it would not
apply the policy in question unless it also applied to the computer
being logged onto.  If the restriction didn't apply to the computer, it
therefore wouldn't be applied, right?

 

Bill Mayo

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GPO weirdness

 

Both. Settings aren't applied, and the GPO doesn't show as being applied
in gpresult.

On 13 April 2012 13:13, Christopher Bodnar <[email protected]>
wrote:

Just read your disclaimer, funny stuff, extraterrestrial eggplants? 

OK back to your issue. When you say the GPO does not apply do you mean
that the settings dont' get enforced, or that the GPO doesn't show up as
being applied  in the output of GPRESULT? 



Christopher Bodnar 
Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services 

Tel 610-807-6459  
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017 
[email protected] 

 

The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

www.guardianlife.com <http://www.guardianlife.com/>  

        






From:        James Rankin <[email protected]> 
To:        "NT System Admin Issues" <
[email protected]> 
Date:        04-13-12 05:12 AM 
Subject:        GPO weirdness 

________________________________




I have a GPO with user settings that I am applying to an OU with
Terminal Servers in it (Loopback Policy Processing is configured in
another GPO on the same OU). I also want to apply a security filter to
the user settings OU so that only a certain AD group are subject to it.
However, whenever I change the security filter from Authenticated Users,
the GPO does not apply even though the user is a member of the AD group
in the security filter. The only way I can get it to work is by adding
the computer accounts for the Terminal Servers to the security filter,
which has me baffled because these are user settings and shouldn't be
applied to the computer accounts, should they? I could be utterly wrong
but I have checked GPOs I used in other, similar environments and I
never had to add computer accounts specifically to a security filter for
a user settings GPO to work.

Can anyone confirm if this is expected behaviour or not?

TIA,



JRR

-- 
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk
<http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/> 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and
received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with
anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK
legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I
must never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene,
indecent, sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright,
encrypted, amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely
to harm animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or
as-yet-nonexistent minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails
of this nature sent in or out of this account may be intercepted and
stopped by the system, but it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if
I was prosecuted for breach of said email guidelines, I'd probably walk
with a suspended sentence anyway, but if I'd forgotten to pay my car
insurance, I'd most certainly be hung, drawn and quartered.

I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has
been sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers
aren't responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and
overdosing, so I'm glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early.
Where opinions are expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I
don't make a habit of expressing other people's opinions for them, so
you shouldn't take that statement as an indication that I am in the
business of providing an opinion-expressing service. In the event that I
did, this discourse would provide no guarantee that I would do it
anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person
responsible for delivering it to them, aside from the fact that you've
clearly got some level of unauthorised access to their account or are at
least engaged in some sort of fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may
not copy, forward disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any
way. To do so may be unlawful, and as you're already breaking the law, I
am sure that bombshell makes you quake in your boots and turn yourself
over to law enforcement immediately. If you receive this e-mail by
mistake, please advise the sender immediately. That would be me, and as
I am clearly prone to sending emails to completely the wrong person, I
should instantly be stripped of my status as a technical consultant and
sent to do something more becoming of my stupidity, such as appearing on
Big Brother, the X Factor or "insert country name here"'s Got Talent.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin 

----------------------------------------- This message, and any
attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message
in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin




-- 
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk

IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and
received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with
anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK
legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I
must never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene,
indecent, sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright,
encrypted, amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely
to harm animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or
as-yet-nonexistent minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails
of this nature sent in or out of this account may be intercepted and
stopped by the system, but it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if
I was prosecuted for breach of said email guidelines, I'd probably walk
with a suspended sentence anyway, but if I'd forgotten to pay my car
insurance, I'd most certainly be hung, drawn and quartered.

I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has
been sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers
aren't responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and
overdosing, so I'm glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early.
Where opinions are expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I
don't make a habit of expressing other people's opinions for them, so
you shouldn't take that statement as an indication that I am in the
business of providing an opinion-expressing service. In the event that I
did, this discourse would provide no guarantee that I would do it
anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person
responsible for delivering it to them, aside from the fact that you've
clearly got some level of unauthorised access to their account or are at
least engaged in some sort of fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may
not copy, forward disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any
way. To do so may be unlawful, and as you're already breaking the law, I
am sure that bombshell makes you quake in your boots and turn yourself
over to law enforcement immediately. If you receive this e-mail by
mistake, please advise the sender immediately. That would be me, and as
I am clearly prone to sending emails to completely the wrong person, I
should instantly be stripped of my status as a technical consultant and
sent to do something more becoming of my stupidity, such as appearing on
Big Brother, the X Factor or "insert country name here"'s Got Talent.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to