Gpresult output is very dependent on how you are running it, permissions, 
arguments, UAC potentially and varies by OS...uh oh...the ubiquitous more-info.

gpresult with the proper arguments and /v redirected to a file can be very 
illuminating. Also don't forget you now have very extensive event logging of GP 
processing by default in win7/2k8

You need at least one GPO that has Read-Apply for the comp accounts, with the 
computer portion enabled and containing your loopback setting, that basically 
tells the system to re-process the links to see what user policies apply 
(subject to filtering).

I believe you will also find the link Andres provided is correct. We user 
either Domain Computers or targeted security groups comprised of both user & 
computers in win7/2008 loopback user policy sec filters, this wasn't necessary 
in earlier OSs.

Merge and replace can get tricky esp depending on the entire hierarchy of 
policies linked above.

*  Replace mode: Only user-settings in GPOs that are linked to the 
loopback-enabled computer account will apply to users logging into the loopback 
computer.

*  Merge mode: User-settings in GPOs that are linked to user's AD object will 
process first (as would normally happen on non-loopback machines) and then 
those user-settings in GPOs that are linked to the loopback-enabled computer 
account process second. Given the last writer-wins rule of GP precedence-any 
conflicting settings in the latter set of user settings would overwrite the 
user's normal settings. This mode can have unintended consequences. For 
example, if you have logon scripts that are linked to GPOs at the domain level, 
these would potentially run twice (once for the computer and then once for the 
user) in merge mode.




From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 6:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: [dkim-failure] Re: GPO weirdness

No. I don't see the GPO at all in gpresult. That's what threw me off for half a 
day - I thought I was looking at an AD replication issue.

On 13 April 2012 13:54, Christopher Bodnar 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
OK, that's a step in the right direction. If the GPO isn't applied the settings 
can't be enforced. So... in GPRESULT do you see that GPO as "filtered out" like 
this? No


The following GPOs were not applied because they were filtered out
-------------------------------------------------------------------
    ACME-2008-Policy1
        Filtering:  Not Applied (Empty)



Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise Architecture 
and Engineering Services

Tel 610-807-6459<tel:610-807-6459>
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

[cid:[email protected]]

The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

www.guardianlife.com<http://www.guardianlife.com/>







From:        James Rankin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To:        "NT System Admin Issues" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date:        04/13/2012 08:49 AM
Subject:        Re: GPO weirdness
________________________________



Both. Settings aren't applied, and the GPO doesn't show as being applied in 
gpresult.

On 13 April 2012 13:13, Christopher Bodnar 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Just read your disclaimer, funny stuff, extraterrestrial eggplants?

OK back to your issue. When you say the GPO does not apply do you mean that the 
settings dont' get enforced, or that the GPO doesn't show up as being applied  
in the output of GPRESULT?
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise Architecture 
and Engineering Services

Tel 610-807-6459<tel:610-807-6459>
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

[cid:[email protected]]

The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

www.guardianlife.com<http://www.guardianlife.com/>








From:        James Rankin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To:        "NT System Admin Issues" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date:        04-13-12 05:12 AM
Subject:        GPO weirdness
________________________________




I have a GPO with user settings that I am applying to an OU with Terminal 
Servers in it (Loopback Policy Processing is configured in another GPO on the 
same OU). I also want to apply a security filter to the user settings OU so 
that only a certain AD group are subject to it. However, whenever I change the 
security filter from Authenticated Users, the GPO does not apply even though 
the user is a member of the AD group in the security filter. The only way I can 
get it to work is by adding the computer accounts for the Terminal Servers to 
the security filter, which has me baffled because these are user settings and 
shouldn't be applied to the computer accounts, should they? I could be utterly 
wrong but I have checked GPOs I used in other, similar environments and I never 
had to add computer accounts specifically to a security filter for a user 
settings GPO to work.

Can anyone confirm if this is expected behaviour or not?

TIA,



JRR

--
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk<http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/>

IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and received 
via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with anyone's policies 
and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK legislation there is some 
politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must never send or store e-mails 
or attachments that are obscene, indecent, sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, 
in breach of copyright, encrypted, amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, 
anonymous, likely to harm animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified 
or as-yet-nonexistent minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of 
this nature sent in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by 
the system, but it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted 
for breach of said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended 
sentence anyway, but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most 
certainly be hung, drawn and quartered.

I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been 
sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't 
responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so I'm 
glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions are 
expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit of 
expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that 
statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an 
opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would 
provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it 
to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some level of unauthorised 
access to their account or are at least engaged in some sort of fraud, I'm 
obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward disclose or otherwise use it or 
any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful, and as you're already 
breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell makes you quake in your boots and 
turn yourself over to law enforcement immediately. If you receive this e-mail 
by mistake, please advise the sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am 
clearly prone to sending emails to completely the wrong person, I should 
instantly be stripped of my status as a technical consultant and sent to do 
something more becoming of my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the 
X Factor or "insert country name here"'s Got Talent.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

----------------------------------------- This message, and any attachments to 
it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, 
copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



--
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk<http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/>

IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and received 
via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with anyone's policies 
and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK legislation there is some 
politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must never send or store e-mails 
or attachments that are obscene, indecent, sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, 
in breach of copyright, encrypted, amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, 
anonymous, likely to harm animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified 
or as-yet-nonexistent minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of 
this nature sent in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by 
the system, but it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted 
for breach of said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended 
sentence anyway, but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most 
certainly be hung, drawn and quartered.

I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been 
sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't 
responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so I'm 
glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions are 
expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit of 
expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that 
statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an 
opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would 
provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it 
to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some level of unauthorised 
access to their account or are at least engaged in some sort of fraud, I'm 
obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward disclose or otherwise use it or 
any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful, and as you're already 
breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell makes you quake in your boots and 
turn yourself over to law enforcement immediately. If you receive this e-mail 
by mistake, please advise the sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am 
clearly prone to sending emails to completely the wrong person, I should 
instantly be stripped of my status as a technical consultant and sent to do 
something more becoming of my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the 
X Factor or "insert country name here"'s Got Talent.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



--
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk

IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and received 
via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with anyone's policies 
and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK legislation there is some 
politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must never send or store e-mails 
or attachments that are obscene, indecent, sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, 
in breach of copyright, encrypted, amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, 
anonymous, likely to harm animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified 
or as-yet-nonexistent minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of 
this nature sent in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by 
the system, but it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted 
for breach of said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended 
sentence anyway, but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most 
certainly be hung, drawn and quartered.

I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been 
sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't 
responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so I'm 
glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions are 
expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit of 
expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that 
statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an 
opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would 
provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it 
to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some level of unauthorised 
access to their account or are at least engaged in some sort of fraud, I'm 
obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward disclose or otherwise use it or 
any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful, and as you're already 
breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell makes you quake in your boots and 
turn yourself over to law enforcement immediately. If you receive this e-mail 
by mistake, please advise the sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am 
clearly prone to sending emails to completely the wrong person, I should 
instantly be stripped of my status as a technical consultant and sent to do 
something more becoming of my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the 
X Factor or "insert country name here"'s Got Talent.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

<<inline: image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to