We just went through a big project to migrate all out file servers to a
NAS.  The evaluation pointed us to NetAPP - EMC failed the Proof Of
Concept when the hardware they brought in was bad and they couldn't
figure out that it was bad until a few days after the POC was complete.
The powers that be chose EMC anyway and we have had a lot of issues - in
one case they again had some bad hardware that they refused to replace
until another vendor pointed them to an EMC log file that was indicating
the hardware was bad....
 
We have a complex environment with 20+ CIFS servers on the NAS in 2
domains.  Many of the issues can be traced to poor support from the EMC
professional services people we brought in to help get the system up and
running.
 
I don't know that NetAPP would have been better, but it probably
couldn't have been much worse.
 
-Brian

 

________________________________

From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: EMC vs NetApp




I just went through this exercise as well, however, it was just for
iSCSI and it was Equallogic that won the bid.  I looked at NetApp, IBM,
EMC, HP and Lefthand as well for a period of four months and it was a no
brainer.  I have my entire server install base within ESX 3.5 with a
Equallogic PS100 for storage.  Looking forward to purchasing another in
late 08 for replication/growth/DR.  

 

Andy

________________________________

From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: EMC vs NetApp

 

 

It's tough to say, all three companies have products that are very good
and will fit your description of what you want, it comes down to price
and features.

 

I just went thru the exercise of comparing Netapp FAS3000 Series and EMC
NS series, they both had NAS, iSCSI, Fiber and large capacity. Overall
we veered towards the Netapp because they had better features than the
NS

 

In the end though we got the NS-40 from EMC because the came $20K under
the Netapp for the same disk space 10 TB and they threw in 2 brocade
Fiber switches, also they support package was well worth it.

 

I'm only familiar with the smaller Equallogic arrays and wasn't
impressed with them, While very easy to setup and manage, We could only
do one type of RAID on the array and on the database we attached thru
iSCSI the data rate could not be sustained for write, but this was one
year ago so they've must have gotten better

 

 

From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: EMC vs NetApp

 


Dell? Ack! lol

On 31/01/2008, Eric E Eskam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 



"Clayton Doige" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/31/2008 09:01:42
AM:

> Looking for centralised storage, the usual, Exchange, SQL, 
> File, Sharepoint. 100 users, 1TB of data, want the ability to 
> replicate to the DR site, and the ability to expand the 
> solution in terms of both storage and processing power as the 
> needs arise. 

http://www.equallogic.com/ <http://www.equallogic.com/>  

That was fast, the Dell logo is now there... 

Eric Eskam
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The contents of this message are mine personally and do not reflect any
position of the U.S. Government
"The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange
protein; it rejects it."
-  P. B. Medawar 











 
 
    




-- 
Regards,

Clayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://alsipius.com 











 
 
    

 






 
    
 
 
 

_________________________________________________________
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other
privileges.
This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are
not
an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized
use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and
delete
the original message and any attachments from your system.
_________________________________________________________

 

 





 
    





    




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to