Read. Relevant. Forwarded!!

From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: This is what I get....

I just did a blog post regarding user rights elevation - obviously there's 
loads of different ways to do this, just thought it was fairly relevant to the 
discussion (or it's just shameless self-promotion, take your pick) :-)

http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/using-appsense-application-manager-user.html
On 19 September 2012 14:55, Kennedy, Jim 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
BTW, I like where your response was coming from. It is the same tact I took.  
We will make it work the way the users need it to without them having admin 
rights. And then I delivered on that promise.

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 9:48 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: This is what I get....

+1

After this reply to my coworker, I started working on exactly this. Since we 
are basically a SaaS shop, our exec's have a habit of focusing only on 
client-side IT issues/development and employee-facing IT is scarcely on any 
C-level's radar. I am also guessing this is not unusual for this type of 
company...

Dave

From: Ken Schaefer 
[mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: This is what I get....

IMHO this is just wasting your time, and could potentially backfire.

Write a business case instead, backed by actual figures/facts, and it needs to 
go up the chain to management.

Making major changes to how a business works is not the job of IT (except in 
the smallest of organisations), and IT trying to enforce something like this 
just makes IT a target for end-user frustration. It will make your job harder 
in future.

Instead, business operations really is the job of the COO (or CIO, or even the 
business enterprise architect - if you have one). Get them to make an informed 
decision, and enforce it down the chain of management. That's what they are 
paid to do.

Cheers
Ken

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2012 12:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: This is what I get....

After I cooled off, I gave him this reply:

Clearly you've never tried to not make them local admins. Give me two of where 
a typical employee (this mean not developers) , and I'll give you two examples 
of how it can be accomplished WITHOUT them being local admin...


From: Jonathan Link 
[mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: This is what I get....

Are those calls documented?  And what was the nature of the call?

After the initial transition, this will actually make admin's lives easier, 
since they have a more controlled environment to work in.

Yeah, some things are easier when they have admin rights, but that doesn't mean 
that users should be doing those things, either.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:22 AM, David Lum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Here's how much fight I get when I even SUGGEST we should be removing admin 
right from our users.

Worthy to note  I am not a local admin on my own NWEA machine, and none of my 
%sidejob% clients are local admins on theirs. This guy knows this, but still 
fights me every time.

This reply incensed me enough to start again working on the management buy-in, 
as it's a lot harder to stop a top down order.


Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 6:35 AM
To: David Lum
Subject: RE: IE 0-day, MS releases bulletin

We have this very rare instance of a Zero Day attack in IE for a few sites and 
you think that is a reason to create the complete nightmare of taking away 
Admin rights to a local machine.  Clearly you don't know how often our users 
are using their admin rights on their machines.      The SD got a call once a 
week from the ONE person who had that setup when she was moved to Windows 7.   
If we spent some time building the infrastructure that makes such a situation 
workable (like I did at the school district I worked at), then we could live 
with our 500 users not being admins.

David Grand

From: David Lum
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 6:24 AM
Subject: IE 0-day, MS releases bulletin

Please read this article and weigh in on the suggested workarounds.

Microsoft has released a bulletin on this, and has suggested workarounds. Most 
can be achieved via GPO:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/advisory/2757760

Note 1: "An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain 
the same user rights as the current user. Users whose accounts are configured 
to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who 
operate with administrative user rights."
SD - this exact scenario is the benefit of users not being local administrators.

Note 2: Some of this is already done via the Trusted Site GPO. Their additional 
recommendations recommend disabling ActiveX for Internet and Local Intranet. 
The latter would disable some Commons functionality, but we can disable it on 
the Internet site zone temporarily. Even this will generate Service Desk calls 
but I feel this is worth mitigating the risk.

Dave

From: David Lum
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:39 PM
Subject: Just so you know that I know..

0-day of the week:

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9231367/Hackers_exploit_new_IE_zero_day_vulnerability?source=rss_latest_content&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+computerworld%2Fnews%2Ffeed+%28Latest+from+Computerworld%29

Dave



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



--
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk

IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and received 
via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with anyone's policies 
and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK legislation there is some 
politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must never send or store e-mails 
or attachments that are obscene, indecent, sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, 
in breach of copyright, encrypted, amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, 
anonymous, likely to harm animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified 
or as-yet-nonexistent minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of 
this nature sent in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by 
the system, but it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted 
for breach of said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended 
sentence anyway, but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most 
certainly be hung, drawn and quartered.

I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been 
sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't 
responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so I'm 
glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions are 
expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit of 
expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that 
statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an 
opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would 
provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it 
to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some level of unauthorised 
access to their account or are at least engaged in some sort of fraud, I'm 
obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward disclose or otherwise use it or 
any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful, and as you're already 
breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell makes you quake in your boots and 
turn yourself over to law enforcement immediately. If you receive this e-mail 
by mistake, please advise the sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am 
clearly prone to sending emails to completely the wrong person, I should 
instantly be stripped of my status as a technical consultant and sent to do 
something more becoming of my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the 
X Factor or "insert country name here"'s Got Talent.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to