Thanks for the follow-up, Patrick




*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for
the SMB market…***






On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Patrick Hasenjager
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I was able to resolve my original problem, which was no being able to add
> file shares to a clustered "file server."  The thread linked here solved
> the problem for me.
>
>
> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserver8gen/thread/9807a799-bea3-46ad-92a5-732779135f98
>
> >>> On 12/6/2012 at 11:03 AM, Steven Peck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> While I like your summary for the most part, evidently my experience with
> MS Clusters while admittedly dated, windows2003 era mostly Exchange and
> SQL, we didn't experience them as fragile. Complex yes, but most issues
> were the result of shooting ourselves in the foot rather then the cluster
> technology itself. With the Best Practice Analyzers this is easier to avoid
> now.
> But we're back to what is meant/desired goal of the original post. 'VMware
> clusters' provide for resilience and reduced downtime. If hardware fails,
> all guests on that node are dead. True, the remaining live nodes will
> usually bring them up quickly but they are still dead until then and if
> there were dependencies, etc. the various services may still need manual
> intervention.
> So, if you need a service availability then you need to look at your SLA
> and match them with the various options..
> So, this thread started with one thing and then wandered afar into various
> technologies.... What needs to be solved?
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Ken Cornetet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Patrick, I am sorry if I came across as attacking your choices. My
> intention was to steer you toward a path that will lead to a happier future
> for you.
>
> The purpose of clustering is to protect against downtime in case something
> fails, or is intentionally taken down for preventative maintenance.
>
> So here are some "somethings" that might happen:
>
> 1. Hardware failure. Both MS and VMWare clustering will protect against
> this.
>
> 2. OS failure - the OS bluescreens. Both MS and VMWare protect against
> this. VMWare detects missing vmware tools heartbeats and migrates the
> server.
>
> 3. The application service crashes (stops). You don't need clustering to
> protect against this, you set the service to auto-restart.
>
> 4. The application service gets lost in space and stops working (but is
> still running). Neither MS or VMWare can protect against this without you
> hitching on some sort of monitoring system.
>
> 5. Patching or other PM. This is where MS clustering can *theoretically*
> reduce (not eliminate) downtime if you have an active/passive cluster. In
> an active/passive cluster, you patch the passive system, reboot, fail over
> to it, then patch and reboot the original active server. However, there is
> still down time as the service is stopped on one node and restarted on the
> other. The only thing that MS clustering eliminates is the time of the
> server reboot. In VMWare, virtuals boot so fast that this only saves you
> less than a minute.
>
> MS clusters have some disadvantages:
>
> 1. Most every service that you run clustered has limitations and caveats
> when running clustered.
> 2. Backing up the data requires a cluster aware backup agent.
> 3. You application settings have to be replicated between nodes - usually
> manually. This can lead to problems when they aren't in sync.
> 4. MS clusters are "fragile". In the old days (windows 2000) clusters
> would go toes up for little or no reason and you'd have to spend hours
> tweaking registry settings and disk signatures to get it back up. This
> improved vastly with Server 2003 - clusters stop failing for no reason, but
> even at Server 2008 R2, clusters are a pain to do disaster recovery with.
>
> In contrast, VMWare clusters just work, and work seamlessly. You don't
> need to take anything special into account on your protected virtuals.
> Normal application settings, normal backups, etc. There is no extra
> complexity to manage.
>
> Admittedly, I've not looked at Server 2012's clustering because we've been
> migrating away from MS clusters.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Hasenjager [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 9:16 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: File Services Clustering in Server 2012
>
> If that is not the purpose of failover clustering, what would your
> definition be? Maybe I need to go another route to resolve this, as it
> seems that all people want to do is attack the choices we have made for our
> institution.
>
> >>> Ken Cornetet <[email protected]> 12/6/2012 7:46 AM >>>
> Maybe I'm missing something. What it is you hope to protect against? I not
> sure what you mean by "services" clustering. Are you thinking that if
> somehow the server service gets hosed on one node of the cluster that MS
> clustering will switch over to the other node?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Hasenjager [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 5:17 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: File Services Clustering in Server 2012
>
> We want "services" clustering in addition to the hardware clustering
> already in our ESXi environment.
>
> >>> Ken Cornetet <[email protected]> 12/5/2012 4:03 PM >>>
> Why in the world would you use a Microsoft cluster when you have the
> vastly superior and easier ESX clustering to provide failover?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Hasenjager [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 4:33 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: File Services Clustering in Server 2012
>
> We are just getting into clustering services, now that we have been
> allowed to purchase a SAN (we have only been asking for more years than I
> can count!). I created a failover cluster in Server 2012 Standard and
> attached 4 nodes to it (all virtuals with VMware ESXi 5.1 - the same
> problem exists whether 1 node is connected or up to all 4). They are
> connected to common LUNs on a NetApp appliance.
>
> Yesterday, everything went to hell. It started off that I could not access
> one of the file shares and then two... then all 4 that we had configured.
> Because this system was not yet being utilized for anyone other than
> myself, I decided to just recreate it. Now that I have done that, I cannot
> configure any file shares.
>
> When I click the "Add File Share" to the cluster role (File Server), the
> "volumes" is blank and I cannot use the browse button. I can type a path,
> but it states that it is not valid for the particular server. According to
> the console, everything is "Running" and "Online." I also cannot access the
> administrative share for the drive which is attached to the role.
>
> I am at a complete loss for ideas and Internet searches have turned up
> absolutely nothing regarding the problem I am having. I'm sure I am missing
> something simple, but cannot come up with what that is. Can anyone assist
> me? Feel free to contact me off-list if it is more convenient.
>
>
>
> PATRICK HASENJAGER | Network Administrator Kansas City University of
> Medicine and Biosciences | Information Technology phone 816.654.7712
> ( tel:816.654.7712)  | fax 816.654.7701
> ( tel:816.654.7701)  email [email protected] | www.kcumb.edu
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to