If either solution will work effectively for you, and it seems to me that either one would, IWA is a little bit more secure than Forms-based authentication, and is the direction that I expect Microsoft to continue with over the long-haul.
I don't see that there are very many security implications for you either way, but I'd be inclined to go with IWA myself. *ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>* **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for the SMB market…*** On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote: > I’ve been asked to use one of these two solutions to fix an ADFS/Chrome > browser issue. I am not very ISS/security savvy, what are the security > implications of each?**** > > ** ** > > > http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/applisec/archive/2012/07/16/chrome-support-for-acs-with-adfs-2-0-identity-provider.aspx > **** > > ** ** > > *David Lum* > Sr. Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764**** > > ** ** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
