Not quite correct. As I understand it, only control and management traffic
goes between the WLC & AP. Everything else (ie client traffic) goes direct.

If you have any AP's hanging off the PoE port and need to free one up think
about using a power injector instead. Not ideal and may not be suitable to
the location of the AP, but definitely an option.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the input.
>
> I knew about the conversion from autonomous to lightweight, and have
> the manual that describes the process, as noted below.
>
> I already have in place the necessary VLANs - one each for management
> (which is shared among all switches), production wireless and guest
> wireless. VoIP never touches the WAPs - that's on another VLAN
> entirely. I'm assuming that the current management VLAN is a
> reasonable choice for managing the WLC and WAPS.
>
> I'm just talking aloud for the rest of this - it's wandering pretty
> far OT for the list, though some might not mind...
>
> Unfortunately I can't do the lag for the WLC directly on our L3 switch
> - it's a 48 port HP 3400cl, and it's completely full, including the
> three PoE switches used for the WAPs. However, I have a 48 port gb
> switch that sits between the L3 switch and the firewall that has
> plenty of ports free, though, so that might be where I place the lag
> for the WLC.
>
> This presents another set of choices:
>
> o- I can leave the PoE switches on the L3 switch, and put the WLC in
> the intermediary switch - this seems less than ideal, as it would
> force a round trip for the wireless data, since all WAP traffic passes
> through the WLC
> or
> o- I could move the PoE switches to the intermediary switch along with
> the WLC and either
>      o- Limit connectivity for the WAPs to the current single gb
> connection between the L3 switch and the intermediary switch.
>      or
>      o- After moving the three PoE switches off of the L3 to the
> intermediary switch, reconfigured the connection between the L3 switch
> and the intermediary as a 3-port lag
>
> Also, according to the manuals, I'm have to set up a new DHCP scope
> for the management VLAN - prior to this all of the equipment on that
> VLAN has had their IP addresses set statically (including the WAPs).
> I'm not entirely happy with that, but I haven't yet seen a way around
> it.
>
> Kurt
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Glen Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We did this a few years back with a 5508 controller and several aps.
> > Basically, you will need one vlan for the aps to talk to the controller.
> > You will have to convert the access points to light weight aps.
> > That wasn't very intuitive, so here is a link.
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/7.2/configuration/guide/cg_lwap.html#wp1345331
> >
> > The controller handles the routing between the ap vlan and the other
> vlan's that the clients will use.
> > What we did is set 4 ports on the controller in a lag, connected to 4
> ports on our core switch.  You will need 7.4 or higher code on the 2504 to
> support lag with its 4 ports.
> > The allowed vlans on this port group are, the controller to ap vlan,
> data vlan for laptops, open access vlan for the public and voice vlan for
> ip phones.
> > Good luck.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 9:00 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: SemiOT: Cisco 2504 WLC tips?
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I'm the happy recipient of this beastie, and I'm reading through a bunch
> of manuals for it, trying to figure out a good approach for transforming
> our 15 x 1240AG WAPs into a cohesive group, rather than managing them
> individually.
> >
> > The WAPs are spread across three HP 2800 PWR switches, and carry three
> VLANs each (one is the management VLAN (wired side only) and two are
> broadcast with different SSIDs - a guest network and a production network,
> both using WPA PSK).
> >
> > First step is to get one of the WAPs talking to the WLC, then once
> that's working, change over the rest, and then I'm going to introduce
> 802.1x in a new SSID, and start switching all of the production wireless to
> it, and (I hope, depending on whether or not our barcode scanners will
> support 802.1x) eliminate the extra SSID.
> >
> > But, I'm finding I have some questions that the manuals aren't
> addressing. For instance, the unit has two standard 1g ports and 2 PoE 1g
> ports. One needs to be the management port, but should I connect the other
> ports to each of my three switches? Each of the switches has a connection
> to my layer3 switch. Should I connect the management port to the L3 switch,
> and out the WLC between the switches and the L3 switch, or should I just
> connect the 3 non-management ports to the switches?
> >
> > Does anyone have some pointers on setting this up?
> >
> > So far, I've found and read most or all of each of these:
> >
> > Cisco2500SeriesWirelessControllerDeploymentGuide
> > Cisco2500SeriesWirelessControllerGettingStartedGuide
> > CiscoWirelessLANControllerConfigurationGuide7_2
> > ConvertAutonomousWAPstoLightweightMode7_2
> >
> > I have browsed through these:
> >
> > CiscoWirelessControlSystemConfigurationGuide_Release7.0.172.0
> > CiscoLocationApplianceConfigurationGuide_Release6.0
> >
> >
> > Haven't touched these yet:
> > CiscoLocationApplianceConfigurationGuide_Release6.0
> > Cisco_SBA_BN_WirelessLANCleanAirDeploymentGuide-Aug2012
> >
> > Any thoughts, on or off list, would be appreciated - even if it's a
> pointer to a Cisco list or forum.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to