> I suspect, if you check the terms of service for Azure, you wouldn't be able
> to sue them for anything more than whatever your SLA says you will get. I'm
> sure their liability is limited up front, not matter what they admit to have
> done or not.

That doesn't stop lawyers from trying.

> FWIW, I thought it was a pretty straightforward explanation of what happened
> and the steps they took to prevent it from happening again.

Agreed. I'm just being cynical today, I guess.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Evans
[mailto:[email protected]]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tue, 05 Mar 2013
13:08:08 -0800
Subject: RE: Details of the February 22nd 2013 Windows Azure
Storage Disruption


> I suspect, if you check the terms of service for Azure, you wouldn't be able
> to sue them for anything more than whatever your SLA says you will get. I'm
> sure their liability is limited up front, not matter what they admit to have
> done or not.
> 
> FWIW, I thought it was a pretty straightforward explanation of what happened
> and the steps they took to prevent it from happening again.
> 
> …Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:38 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Details of the February 22nd 2013 Windows Azure Storage
> Disruption
> 
> > What more can be said?  Having had very similar issues where I work
> > (co-worker patched and rebooted all the production servers in a small
> > resource domain 3 days early because he clicked the wrong box) why
> wouldn't
> > you take this at face value?
> 
> Because Microsoft wouldn't want to be sued by everybody who lost business
> during the outage. It is in their best interest to say "Yup, it was a
> problem, and we fixed it." It is _not_ in their best interest to say "Yup,
> it was a problem. We forgot to do something we were supposed to do. We fixed
> it." It's a small thing, but it's still important to those pesky lawyers.
> 
> <cynic>And why wouldn't they lie, if it makes them look better anyways?
> Maybe they had a much more major issue. Sure, it's more likely that they had
> their certificate issue, but who knows.</cynic>
> 
> 
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School District
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Steven Peck
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tue, 05 Mar 2013
> 12:11:41 -0800
> Subject: Re: Details of the February 22nd 2013 Windows Azure
> Storage Disruption
> 
> 
> > Did you just manage to agree and also imply "Sure, they released it but
> are
> > probably still not telling us what 'really happened"?
> > 
> > Because that's sort of what it seems like you just did.  They said they
> had
> > a process and human error entered the process.  Now that they know what
> > happened they can take steps to hopefully reduce the chance of it
> happening
> > again.
> > 
> > What more can be said?  Having had very similar issues where I work
> > (co-worker patched and rebooted all the production servers in a small
> > resource domain 3 days early because he clicked the wrong box) why
> wouldn't
> > you take this at face value?
> > 
> > Steven Peck
> > http://www.blkmtn.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Matthew W. Ross
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > 
> > > Agreed, but I also know that all released information goes through PR.
> I'm
> > > sure this released report was scrubbed clean of anything that could have
> > > made Microsoft liable.
> > >
> > > Heck, I'm guilty of a bit of spin. I accidentally plugged a switch back
> > > into itself, causing a loop? My internal release states "A network
> > > configuration error occurred". Sm:)e.
> > >
> > >
> > > --Matt Ross
> > > Ephrata School District
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Ben Scott
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tue, 05 Mar 2013
> > > 10:28:00 -0800
> > > Subject: Re: Details of the February 22nd 2013 Windows Azure
> > > Storage Disruption
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Tim Evans <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazure/archive/2013/03/01/details-of-the-february-22nd-2013-windows-azure-storage-disruption.aspx
> > > >
> > > >   I give MSFT credit for doing a good analysis and *publishing it*.  A
> > > > lot of companies just say "Sorry, we've fixed it, and we promise it'll
> > > > never happen again (and this time, we really mean it)" over and over.
> > > > Good on them for that.
> > > >
> > > > -- Ben
> > > >
> > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > To manage subscriptions click here:
> > > > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > > > or send an email to [email protected]
> > > > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> > > >
> > >
> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> > >
> > > ---
> > > To manage subscriptions click here:
> > > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > > or send an email to [email protected]
> > > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> > 
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to [email protected]
> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to