Not necessarily, don't mix capacity with speed.  A 2 link Port-Channel is still 
2 x 1 Gbs link.  If the backup is between only 2 IP (not multiplexing backup 
from multiple sources), the Port-Channel algorithm will still give you only 1 
Gbs per IP pairs or port pair, etc.  You have to check the load-balancing 
option of the Port-Channel in your system.  There is multiple algorithm 
available to load-balance in the Port-Channel.  You have to chose the correct 
one for your system.
 
 

________________________________

De : Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] 
Envoyé : 10 avril 2013 10:27
À : NT System Admin Issues
Objet : Re: Datadomain / Exagrid - Backup Times over Cat5


A two-port trunk will reduce that significantly, of course...


 

 

ASB
http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker> 
Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for the 
SMB market...

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jon D <[email protected]> wrote:


        True. I'm trying to backup ~4TB in under 12 hours. 8 hours would be 
nice...
        I think a single 1Gig Cat5 cable is going to get me around 23 hours at 
around 850Mbps
         
         
         


        On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
        

                On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Jon D <[email protected]> 
wrote:
                > I'm trying to wrap my head around the speed of backup 
appliances like Data
                > Domain and Exagrid.
                > The thing that doesn't make sense to me is the backups are 
going across
                > Cat5.
                > It seems like they would be really slow for a full backup.
                
                
                  That depends how fast the network you're running is, and how 
much
                data you've got to worry about, and maybe other things.
                
                  Gigabit Ethernet can stream 125,000,000 8-bit quantities per 
second.
                 Framing and protocol overhead rob significantly from that.  
Let's
                assume 75% efficiency, just to have a number.  That's 93 
megabytes per
                second, or 337 gigabytes in one hour.  If you're only backing 
up a
                terabyte, that might be just fine.  If you're backing up a 
petabyte,
                not so much.
                
                -- Ben
                

                ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource 
hog! ~
                ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
                
                ---
                To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
                or send an email to [email protected]
                with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
                


        ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
        ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
        
        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to [email protected]
        with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to