We are running TS virtualised on ESX with about 40 users and its running fine. They are reasonably well specified, with the 2 hosts being ProLiant DL380 64bit dual quad-core + 16Gb memory and each VM having 2Gb memory and a single core to play with. We also use 2X to load balance. I don't use the facility myself but my colleagues tell me that they and their users are happy with the response.
Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Phil Guevara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 February 2008 00:34 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Virtualize Terminal Server or not? Anyone know if it makes sense to virtualize a core terminal server that will have about 50 concurrent users connecting to it? Or is it better to get a new server that will be dedicated for this purpose? Best Regards, Phil Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England & Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 30 Millbank, London SW1P 4QD. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
