I did use Lookout. I didn't think it worked with Outlook 2007 cached mode.
Malcolm From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 26 February, 2008 15:06 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anything against implementing WDS? Then you never tried the Lookout tool that MS purchased and then depricated in favor of WDS. Lookout was 10x as fast for Outlook as WDS. On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Malcolm Reitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The integration with Windows Desktop Search is my favorite part of Outlook 2007. It makes finding email sooo much easier. Malcolm -----Original Message----- From: Osama Salah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 26 February, 2008 03:36 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anything against implementing WDS? I think the trend is not to organize but to search for it, at least that the new world order according to Google :) I'm thinking about deploying it but keep it disabled and give the user an option to enable it. that should satisfy the few who want it and the rest don't care. Need to investigate now how to best do that. regards Osama Salah -----Original Message----- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 8:07 PMd To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anything against implementing WDS? To give this thread, I too am curious about people's experience managing Desktop Search programs. I have a few users that have used it; it involves the occasional slowness of their machine, and corrupted indexes from time to time. Other than that, not much of a pain. We used cached mode in outlook, so our server is not taking a hit... Personally, I fear these programs will replace normal organizing of correspondence that we require our users to perform. Thoughts? -----Original Message----- From: Osama Salah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anything against implementing WDS? Neither, sorry didn't realize there are so many WDS's I meant Windows Desktop Search. rgds OS -----Original Message----- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 5:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anything against implementing WDS? WDS? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Distribution_System or http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/servermanager/windows deploymentservices.mspx? I assume that it's the former rather than the latter. There are 2 big drawbacks against WDS: * each hop cuts the bandwidth in *half* * Your security is severely limited - the only real access control options are WPA-PSK or WPA2-PSK. Anything else is proprietary to the AP vendor you use. Lack of standardization is the cause of the second point. Osama Salah wrote: > are there any drawbacks, disadvantages, pitfalls in implementing WDS in > the company (about 1000) users? > We have never used and a few users asked for it. I was wondering if > there is anything I should be careful about or if it's all roses. -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This communication contains information that is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this communication or the information in it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please notify the sender by return email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------- ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This communication contains information that is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this communication or the information in it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please notify the sender by return email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------- ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
