There is only one schema per forest.

Again, unlikely to be any negative impact, but it will impact all domains in 
the forest (e.g. replication of new objects)

Cheers
Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Ewy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 3 May 2008 9:15 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Extending Win 2003 AD schema for Secure Computing
>
> You should be fine setting it up, the other domains should not be
> adversely impacted.
>
> Greg Ewy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ajay Kulsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 3:33 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Extending Win 2003 AD schema for Secure Computing
>
> Have anyone gone thru extending AD schema for Secure Computing's
> SafeWord
> RemoteAccess tokens? Is it rather safe to do on production DC or did
> you
>
> isolate a root DC before doing the schema change.
>
> In our AD forest, only one domain will be using these tokens, and we
> hope
> other 6 domains are not adversely affected. Thanks for any input.
>
> Jay Kulsh
> ------------------------
> So. Pasadena, CA
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to