I use a 2000 with a 4100 and it works fine. It integrates w/ AD no problem. Configuration was a bit of an issue but that's mostly because I've never done one.

My only issue has been with remote access when a user has the same subnet as a resource inside my network. In fact - I'm currently renumbering my networks from 192.168.x.x to 10.x for this very reason. My corporate office with most of the stuff people need remotely was 192.168.0.x which is the same as 90% of the home routers. Remote access not so bueno. Only 500 PCs on 25 subnets all across Southern California. Oh yeah - printers, IP phones, switches...

Kirk
Kirk Woloshyn
2825 Temple Avenue
Signal Hill, CA 90755

v 562.304.1939
c 562.682.0261


Kurt Buff wrote:
Is anyone using one of these?

Can you speak specifically to the differences between the 200 and the
2000 models?

I'm looking at the comparison chart, and the 200 doesn't seem to
support AD integration, which might be OK, but I'm really looking for
quality of experience. Does the 200 really support 50 users well, or
if I have that many should I move to the 2000?


Kurt




PS - I'm abandoning SSLExplorer - the publisher took the latest rev
private - it's no longer GPL'ed, and although I could stay at the last
GPL rev, nobody's yet taken up maintenance of that, nor forked it. I
was on top of paying for help, but when a publisher revokes the GPL,
they're not playing the game any more, and I'll drop the product as
soon as I can.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
  




Reply via email to