Very true. What we need now is a mechanism for stopping the user from running apps outside of the security zones.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Mike Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The non-standard location part is kind of a normal thing nowadays isn't it? > I mean with portableapps.com and thumb drives and all. Chrome certainly > shouldn't get the credit for inventing that. > > -- > Mike Gill > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:12 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Google Chrome plays outside of Vista Security Zones > > Which is why we've migrated towards using GPO to block all unknown > executables. > > Thanks, Google, for trying to help users bypass their corporate security > structure by putting your app in a non-standard location. That's very > responsible of you. > > > > John Hornbuckle > MIS Department > Taylor County School District > 318 North Clark Street > Perry, FL 32347 > > www.taylor.k12.fl.us > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
