On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Laurence Childs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > X-Spam-Score: 6.2 (++++++)
Total score based on all analysis features. > X-Spam-Flag: YES Message classified as spam based on individual scoring criteria. > X-Spam-Report: 6.2/6.0 No idea really, but Im guessing that you scored 6.2, and perhaps the spam threshold was 6.0? > ---- Start SpamAssassin results > > * 1.0 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry A content-type that SA isnt recognizing as legit. Perhaps the header field is being broken during the SMTP session. > * 0.4 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message HTML email gets a positive scoring in a lot of spam filters. Quite normal. > * 1.8 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars There is no legit enforcement of a plain-text line-wrap limit this low - although 72 characters is a pseudo standard. Depending on how this is scored, this could be a legit way to bolster a possible spam score. I think the RFC standard is 255 max characters (?). > * 1.4 SARE_GIF_ATTACH FULL: Email has a inline gif You have an in-line gif attachment embedded in your HTML. > * 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS You have no rDNS specified for your outbound email server. i.e. You don't have a DNS reverse record (a PTR record). This will get you blocked from many main-stream mail domains. > * 1.5 MY_CID_AND_ARIAL2 SARE CID and Arial2 Not sure about this, but Im guessing its an additional scoring characteristic for your attached HTML. -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
