They do leave their websites up 24x7 so the heat fact plays a mojor part
into this. Especially since the drives and servers sit in a closet with
improper air flow and cooling.

thanks

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>  While I can surely relate to a company wanting me to do cheap sh!t but
> wanting reliability etc etc I can only point you to ASB's famous sig: "Fast,
> cheap, reliable. Pick two"
>
> Those wont be redundant and the performance is very bad (they are for home
> owners…). I can't see a DB application being thrilled with the potential
> latencies you will likely encounter not to mention the non redundancy of the
> disc's and power supplies. Keep in mind the duty cycle of those devices
> isn't meant to be 24x7 so they will probably get hot which = fail soon.
>
>
>
> Don't envy your task, been there many times.
>
>
>
> jlc
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* MarvinC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 01, 2008 12:28 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* An alternate storage solution needed...
>
>
>
> I'm looking for an affordable solution to replace a failed disk array. The
> array had 7 drives that were configured as a RAID 5, totaling 100GB, and
> attached to a webserver. Both power supplies died on the server and now none
> of the data on those drives are accessible. This would include the company's
> websites. To make things worse the vendor that makes the power suppies,
> Martek, is based out of China and don't have any in stock. Unfortunately the
> company doesn't have any backups so they've come to grips with the fact that
> they'll have to move on without being able to recover or salvage any of that
> data.
>  What I'm trying to do is provide an affordable replacement solution where
> the device hooks up to a web server and is seen as an attached drive for
> their websites which have MySQL databases. So I'm wondering if anyone have
> any opinions on using Shared Network Storage over NAS or SAN devices? From
> the looks of it the shared network storage devies fall inline with their
> immediate budget whereas the other two are more expensive.
> Here are a few devices I've come across:
>
> LinkStation Live 500GB Shared Network Storage
> Cost: $179.00
> http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0256819
>
> Iomega(R) StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1TB
> Cost: $309.00
> http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0282051
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to