Lmao -----Original Message----- From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:05 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SysInternals Updates
I think he means $\bin\laden. Little known Linux directory where self-exploding binaries are keps. -- Durf On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that the same as a b-in-laden? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:38 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: SysInternals Updates > > Probably not as rough as being binladen. > > -- > Mike Gill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 7:47 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: SysInternals Updates > > It's rough being unladen. > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > -- -------------- Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3490 (20081002) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3490 (20081002) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
