I'm pretty sure that's correct, or at least that's how things appear to
work.

Regarding Richard's question about the permissions, some of the ways of
setting up permissions don't display on the "front" tab of the permissions
window, but are specialized enough that you need to go to the "advanced"
tab. Permissions that are limited, e.g., apply only to child objects, or
only files, not folders, will be displayed on the "Advanced" tab, and the
"front" tab checkboxes will be blank. There will be some fine print at the
bottom about other permissions not displayed, which can be displayed on the
Advanced tab.

Jim von Stein
Information Services Administrator
SOASTC


-----Original Message-----
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 10:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Who is "CREATOR OWNER"?

I could be way off-base here, but my understanding is that the Creator is
the person/account who created the file/directory in question. The Creator
is the Owner, by default. However, administrators can take over ownership of
the objects.





John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us





-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 12:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Who is "CREATOR OWNER"?

I've had some exposure/experience with Unix and linux, so this is very
puzzling to me...

Why is it that, for file/folder permissions in my XP Pro systems, there is
this critter, "CREATOR OWNER", who has no permissions?  From what I've
read at TechNet, "C/O" has full permissions for a number of folders,
including "Program Files" and "Documents and Settings" (the complete
sub-path for each of them) as well as some others.

Anyway, could someone please explain to me Microsoft's conception of
"owner"?

Either this is something completely different from "owner" in x-nix
systems, or all permissions are unchecked because "C/O" already has full
permsissions and so the boxes need not be checked.  (If this is the case,
then, why are they checked for Administrators?)

Thanks!
--------------------------------------
Richard McClary, Systems Administrator
ASPCA Knowledge Management
1717 S Philo Rd, Ste 36, Urbana, IL  61802
217-337-9761
http://www.aspca.org


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to