I covered this recently in pretty good detail on my blog and in EMO. Start here:

 

http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/09/19/it-s-all-about-the-iops-silly.aspx

 

I’ve got a half-chapter on this topic in my upcoming book, because it’s 
something that confuses far too many people. There I include examples 
calculating the numbers of disks required for small, medium, and large 
organizations; how RAID-1 and RAID-5 affect those IOPS calculations, and 
whether you actually need more than one disk (if not for RAID). And, of course, 
how you properly monitor for all of this.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange

 

From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 4:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Basic Drive Partition Question

 

No articles but it's common knowledge that you have to have seperate spindles 
to maintain performance with Exchange. You're still doing read|write with a 
single drives heads no matter how you split it up. 
John W. Cook 
Systems Administrator 
Partnership For Strong Families 
Painfully sent to you from my Blackberry

  _____  

From: Bill Lambert 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Sent: Tue Oct 28 15:56:54 2008
Subject: Basic Drive Partition Question 

We’ve been arguing here…and I can’t find anything definitive on Google…

 

Is there any gain in performance if you have a single (NTFS) drive in two 
partitions?  One partition for the OS and the other for everything else?

 

I say no but it wouldn’t be the first time I’ve been wrong.

 

Bill Lambert

Windows System Administrator

Concuity

A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc.  

Phone  847-941-9206

Fax  847-465-9147



NASDAQ: TTPA

The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, 
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) 
named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive 
information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received 
this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, 
or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all 
copies of this message.  Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

  _____  

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.gif>>

Reply via email to