Didn't some magazine do an extensive review that we discussed here a while back? If memory serves, their benchmarks showed the two products fairly neck and neck, with VMWare taking the performance lead--but by a slim margin, not a landslide...
-----Original Message----- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: VMWARE to Hyper-V and HAL types In my eyes it is still a BETA product seeing as it still has a hell of a long way to go before they get it to where it needs to be. S...:) -----Original Message----- From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 9:42 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: VMWARE to Hyper-V and HAL types > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin > Subject: RE: VMWARE to Hyper-V and HAL types > > You should have stuck with VMWare....ESXi (Also Free), is far superior > to HyperV Beta...And I'm a Microsoft guy...HyperV won't catch up for a > good few years yet. > > If you think HyperV is fast, ESXi will blow you away. HyperV has been out of beta for some time now. Unless your "HyperV Beta" remark is a snide sarcastic comment on anything less than HyperV Version 3 being a beta release. Webster ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
